Abstract
IVANOV,LEVIN, AND NIEDERLE claim that the results from their common-value second-price auction experiment casts a doubt on beliefs-based models as explanations for the winner’s curse. In this note, we first argue that ILN’s theoretical arguments are misleading (Section 2). Wethen show that beliefs-based models do not necessarily imply ILN’s predictions and are compatible with some observations (Sections 3 and 4). We also discuss other points (Section 5).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 375-383 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Econometrica |
Volume | 83 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 18 Feb 2015 |
Keywords
- Beliefs-based models
- Common-value auctions
- Experiments