A comparative study of technological learning and organizational capability development in complex products systems: Distinctive paths of three latecomers in military aircraft industry

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative study of technological learning and organizational capability development in complex products systems

T2 - Distinctive paths of three latecomers in military aircraft industry

AU - Lee, Joosung J.

AU - Yoon, Hyungseok

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - This paper identifies different patterns of latecomers' technological learning in developing complex products systems (CoPS). The experiences of South Korea, China, and Brazil in military aircraft development are compared to explain the learning process in attaining indigenous technological capability. The military aircraft development programs involving international technology transfer agreements have been documented to investigate the technological learning patterns. We find different technology acquisition modes determined by latecomers' focus of knowledge-base: technological for "make" and production for "buy". We also find that these modes may influence the process of learning-by-doing. In addition, we find how the role of foreign partners influences technology acquisition mode. Whereas an active role results in co-production or co-development arrangement, a passive role leads to the vitalization of reverse engineering. We also shed light on the role of government policy initiatives that facilitate technological learning. Lastly, this paper extensively documented the successful technological learning in South Korea's T-50 and Brazil's AMX joint venture projects.

AB - This paper identifies different patterns of latecomers' technological learning in developing complex products systems (CoPS). The experiences of South Korea, China, and Brazil in military aircraft development are compared to explain the learning process in attaining indigenous technological capability. The military aircraft development programs involving international technology transfer agreements have been documented to investigate the technological learning patterns. We find different technology acquisition modes determined by latecomers' focus of knowledge-base: technological for "make" and production for "buy". We also find that these modes may influence the process of learning-by-doing. In addition, we find how the role of foreign partners influences technology acquisition mode. Whereas an active role results in co-production or co-development arrangement, a passive role leads to the vitalization of reverse engineering. We also shed light on the role of government policy initiatives that facilitate technological learning. Lastly, this paper extensively documented the successful technological learning in South Korea's T-50 and Brazil's AMX joint venture projects.

KW - Complex products systems

KW - Latecomer technological learning

KW - Military aircraft industry

KW - Technology acquisition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949536913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2015.03.007

DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2015.03.007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84949536913

SN - 0048-7333

VL - 44

SP - 1296

EP - 1313

JO - Research policy

JF - Research policy

IS - 7

ER -