A Comparison of the Business Object Notation and the Unified Modelling Language

Richard F. Paige; Jonathan S. Ostroff; Robert B. France; Bernhard Rumpe

A Comparison of the Business Object Notation and the Unified Modelling Language

Richard F. Paige, Jonathan S. Ostroff, Robert B. France, Bernhard Rumpe

Computer Science

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

Abstract

Seamlessness, reversibility, and software contracting have been proposedas important, if not essential, techniques to be supported by object-orientedmodeling languages and methods. These techniques are used to provide a frameworkfor the comparison of two modeling languages, the Business Object Notation(BON)--which has been designed to support the techniques--and the UnifiedModeling Language (UML). Elements of the UML and its constraint language,OCL, that do not support these techniques are discussed.

Original language	Undefined/Unknown
Pages	67-82
Publication status	Published - 1999

Bibliographical note

ISBN:3-540-66712-1

Access to Document

http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1767306

Cite this

@conference{5daa226e108c4b63b7c1c14279a82d09,

title = "A Comparison of the Business Object Notation and the Unified Modelling Language",

abstract = "Seamlessness, reversibility, and software contracting have been proposedas important, if not essential, techniques to be supported by object-orientedmodeling languages and methods. These techniques are used to provide a frameworkfor the comparison of two modeling languages, the Business Object Notation(BON)--which has been designed to support the techniques--and the UnifiedModeling Language (UML). Elements of the UML and its constraint language,OCL, that do not support these techniques are discussed.",

author = "Paige, {Richard F.} and Ostroff, {Jonathan S.} and France, {Robert B.} and Bernhard Rumpe",

note = "ISBN:3-540-66712-1 ",

year = "1999",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

pages = "67--82",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - A Comparison of the Business Object Notation and the Unified Modelling Language

AU - Paige, Richard F.

AU - Ostroff, Jonathan S.

AU - France, Robert B.

AU - Rumpe, Bernhard

N1 - ISBN:3-540-66712-1

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Seamlessness, reversibility, and software contracting have been proposedas important, if not essential, techniques to be supported by object-orientedmodeling languages and methods. These techniques are used to provide a frameworkfor the comparison of two modeling languages, the Business Object Notation(BON)--which has been designed to support the techniques--and the UnifiedModeling Language (UML). Elements of the UML and its constraint language,OCL, that do not support these techniques are discussed.

AB - Seamlessness, reversibility, and software contracting have been proposedas important, if not essential, techniques to be supported by object-orientedmodeling languages and methods. These techniques are used to provide a frameworkfor the comparison of two modeling languages, the Business Object Notation(BON)--which has been designed to support the techniques--and the UnifiedModeling Language (UML). Elements of the UML and its constraint language,OCL, that do not support these techniques are discussed.

M3 - Paper

SP - 67

EP - 82

ER -