By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

A diagnostic illusory? The case of distinguishing between "vegetative" and "minimally conscious" states

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Full text download(s)

Published copy (DOI)



Publication details

JournalSocial science and medicine
DateAccepted/In press - 23 Jun 2014
DateE-pub ahead of print - 27 Jun 2014
DatePublished (current) - Sep 2014
Number of pages8
Pages (from-to)134-141
Early online date27/06/14
Original languageEnglish


Throughout affluent societies there are growing numbers of people who survive severe brain injuries only to be left with long-term chronic disorders of consciousness. This patient group who exist betwixt and between life and death are variously diagnosed as in 'comatose', 'vegetative', and, more recently, 'minimally conscious' states. Drawing on a nascent body of sociological work in this field and developments in the sociology of diagnosis in concert with Bauman's thesis of 'ambivalence' and Turner's work on 'liminality', this article proposes a concept we label as diagnostic illusory in order to capture the ambiguities, nuanced complexities and tensions that the biomedical imperative to name and classify these patients give rise to. Our concept emerged through a reading of debates within medical journals alongside an analysis of qualitative data generated by way of a study of accounts of those close to patients: primarily relatives (N=51); neurologists (N=4); lawyers (N=2); and others (N=5) involved in their health care in the UK.

Bibliographical note

© 2014 The Authors

    Research areas

  • Ambivalence, Diagnosis, Minimally conscious state, Qualitative, Vegetative

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations