By the same authors

From the same journal

A Methodological Synthesis of Self-Paced Reading in Second Language Research: Methodological synthesis of SPR tests

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalApplied Psycholinguistics
DateAccepted/In press - 20 Dec 2017
DateE-pub ahead of print - 17 May 2018
DatePublished (current) - 1 Sep 2018
Issue number5
Volume39
Pages (from-to)861–904
Early online date17/05/18
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Self-paced reading tests (SPRs) are being increasingly adopted by second language (L2) researchers. Using SPR with L2 populations presents specific challenges and its use is still evolving in L2 research (compared to its longer history in L1 research). Although the topic of several narrative overviews (Keating & Jegerski, 2015; Roberts, 2016), we do not have a comprehensive picture of its usage in L2 research. Building on the growing body of systematic reviews of research practices in applied linguistics (e.g., Liu & Brown, 2015; Plonsky, 2013), we report a methodological synthesis of the rationales, study contexts, and methodological decision-making in L2 SPR research. Our comprehensive search yielded 74 SPRs used in L2 research. Each instrument was coded along 121 parameters including: reported rationales and study characteristics, indicating the scope and nature of L2 SPR research agendas; design and analysis features and reporting practices, determining instrument validity and reliability; and materials transparency, affecting reproducibility and systematicity of agendas. Our findings indicate an urgent need to standardize the use and reporting of this technique, requiring empirical investigation to inform methodological decision-making. We also identify several areas (e.g., study design, sample demographics, instrument construction, data analysis and transparency) where SPR research could be improved to enrich our understanding of L2 processing, reading and learning.

Bibliographical note

© Cambridge University Press 2018. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations