A rapid evidence review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of alcohol control policies: an English perspective

Robyn Burton, Clive Henn, Don Lavoie, Rosanna O'Connor, Clare Perkins, Kate Sweeney, Felix Greaves, Brian Ferguson, Caryl Beynon, Annalisa Belloni, Virginia Musto, John Marsden, Nick Sheron

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper reviews the evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies to reduce alcohol-related harm. Policies focus on price, marketing, availability, information and education, the drinking environment, drink-driving, and brief interventions and treatment. Although there is variability in research design and measured outcomes, evidence supports the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies that address affordability and marketing. An adequate reduction in temporal availability, particularly late night on-sale availability, is effective and cost-effective. Individually-directed interventions delivered to at-risk drinkers and enforced legislative measures are also effective. Providing information and education increases awareness, but is not sufficient to produce long-lasting changes in behaviour. At best, interventions enacted in and around the drinking environment lead to small reductions in acute alcohol-related harm. Overall, there is a rich evidence base to support the decisions of policy makers in implementing the most effective and cost-effective policies to reduce alcohol-related harm.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1558-1580
Number of pages23
JournalThe Lancet
Volume389
Issue number10078
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2017

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Alcoholism/therapy
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • England
  • Humans
  • Treatment Outcome

Cite this