TY - JOUR
T1 - A Review of Multimodal Hallucinations
T2 - Categorization, Assessment, Theoretical Perspectives, and Clinical Recommendations
AU - Montagnese, Marcella
AU - Leptourgos, Pantelis
AU - Fernyhough, Charles
AU - Waters, Flavie
AU - Laroi, Frank
AU - Jardri, Renaud
AU - McCarthy-Jones, Simon
AU - Thomas, Neil
AU - Dudley, Rob
AU - Taylor, John Paul
AU - Collerton, Daniel
AU - Urwyler, Prabitha
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center.
PY - 2021/1/1
Y1 - 2021/1/1
N2 - Hallucinations can occur in different sensory modalities, both simultaneously and serially in time. They have typically been studied in clinical populations as phenomena occurring in a single sensory modality. Hallucinatory experiences occurring in multiple sensory systems - multimodal hallucinations (MMHs) - are more prevalent than previously thought and may have greater adverse impact than unimodal ones, but they remain relatively underresearched. Here, we review and discuss: (1) the definition and categorization of both serial and simultaneous MMHs, (2) available assessment tools and how they can be improved, and (3) the explanatory power that current hallucination theories have for MMHs. Overall, we suggest that current models need to be updated or developed to account for MMHs and to inform research into the underlying processes of such hallucinatory phenomena. We make recommendations for future research and for clinical practice, including the need for service user involvement and for better assessment tools that can reliably measure MMHs and distinguish them from other related phenomena.
AB - Hallucinations can occur in different sensory modalities, both simultaneously and serially in time. They have typically been studied in clinical populations as phenomena occurring in a single sensory modality. Hallucinatory experiences occurring in multiple sensory systems - multimodal hallucinations (MMHs) - are more prevalent than previously thought and may have greater adverse impact than unimodal ones, but they remain relatively underresearched. Here, we review and discuss: (1) the definition and categorization of both serial and simultaneous MMHs, (2) available assessment tools and how they can be improved, and (3) the explanatory power that current hallucination theories have for MMHs. Overall, we suggest that current models need to be updated or developed to account for MMHs and to inform research into the underlying processes of such hallucinatory phenomena. We make recommendations for future research and for clinical practice, including the need for service user involvement and for better assessment tools that can reliably measure MMHs and distinguish them from other related phenomena.
KW - computational
KW - hallucinations
KW - multisensory
KW - psychosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100362147&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/schbul/sbaa101
DO - 10.1093/schbul/sbaa101
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32772114
AN - SCOPUS:85100362147
SN - 0586-7614
VL - 47
SP - 237
EP - 248
JO - Schizophrenia bulletin
JF - Schizophrenia bulletin
IS - 1
ER -