By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

A rights-based perspective on adaptive capacity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

A rights-based perspective on adaptive capacity. / Ensor, J E; Park, S E; Hoddy, E T; Ratner, B D.

In: Global Environmental Change, Vol. 31, 03.2015, p. 38-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Ensor, JE, Park, SE, Hoddy, ET & Ratner, BD 2015, 'A rights-based perspective on adaptive capacity', Global Environmental Change, vol. 31, pp. 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.005

APA

Ensor, J. E., Park, S. E., Hoddy, E. T., & Ratner, B. D. (2015). A rights-based perspective on adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 31, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.005

Vancouver

Ensor JE, Park SE, Hoddy ET, Ratner BD. A rights-based perspective on adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change. 2015 Mar;31:38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.005

Author

Ensor, J E ; Park, S E ; Hoddy, E T ; Ratner, B D. / A rights-based perspective on adaptive capacity. In: Global Environmental Change. 2015 ; Vol. 31. pp. 38-49.

Bibtex - Download

@article{d1c0f742da834f0a9c9c1162bea93a9d,
title = "A rights-based perspective on adaptive capacity",
abstract = "Whilst it is increasingly recognised that socio-political contexts shape climate change adaptation decisions and actions at all scales, current modes of development typically fail to recognise or adequately challenge these contexts where they constrain capacity to adapt. To address this failing, we consider how a rights-based approach broadens understanding of adaptive capacity while directing attention towards causes of exclusion and marginalisation. Drawing on human rights principles and lessons from rights- based practice, we develop a novel analytical tool for use with communities that considers adaptive capacity through examination of equality, transparency, accountability and empowerment. We apply this to the illustrative case of aquatic agricultural systems in Timor-Leste. This approach yields a qualitative analysis that unpacks the formal and informal institutions and actors that structure opportunities and barriers to adaptive actions. The rights framing exposes the processes of marginalisation and exclusion that lead to differentiation in adaptive capacity, but at the same time helps identify concrete actions that can be taken as part of a rights-based approach to development support for adaptive capacity. The tool and empirical illustration support an emerging body of thought that adaptive capacity requires development actors to engage not only with the technical challenges of responding to climate change, but also with the social and political context that determines the distribution of costs and benefits.",
author = "Ensor, {J E} and Park, {S E} and Hoddy, {E T} and Ratner, {B D}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.005",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "38--49",
journal = "Global Environmental Change",
issn = "0959-3780",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - A rights-based perspective on adaptive capacity

AU - Ensor, J E

AU - Park, S E

AU - Hoddy, E T

AU - Ratner, B D

PY - 2015/3

Y1 - 2015/3

N2 - Whilst it is increasingly recognised that socio-political contexts shape climate change adaptation decisions and actions at all scales, current modes of development typically fail to recognise or adequately challenge these contexts where they constrain capacity to adapt. To address this failing, we consider how a rights-based approach broadens understanding of adaptive capacity while directing attention towards causes of exclusion and marginalisation. Drawing on human rights principles and lessons from rights- based practice, we develop a novel analytical tool for use with communities that considers adaptive capacity through examination of equality, transparency, accountability and empowerment. We apply this to the illustrative case of aquatic agricultural systems in Timor-Leste. This approach yields a qualitative analysis that unpacks the formal and informal institutions and actors that structure opportunities and barriers to adaptive actions. The rights framing exposes the processes of marginalisation and exclusion that lead to differentiation in adaptive capacity, but at the same time helps identify concrete actions that can be taken as part of a rights-based approach to development support for adaptive capacity. The tool and empirical illustration support an emerging body of thought that adaptive capacity requires development actors to engage not only with the technical challenges of responding to climate change, but also with the social and political context that determines the distribution of costs and benefits.

AB - Whilst it is increasingly recognised that socio-political contexts shape climate change adaptation decisions and actions at all scales, current modes of development typically fail to recognise or adequately challenge these contexts where they constrain capacity to adapt. To address this failing, we consider how a rights-based approach broadens understanding of adaptive capacity while directing attention towards causes of exclusion and marginalisation. Drawing on human rights principles and lessons from rights- based practice, we develop a novel analytical tool for use with communities that considers adaptive capacity through examination of equality, transparency, accountability and empowerment. We apply this to the illustrative case of aquatic agricultural systems in Timor-Leste. This approach yields a qualitative analysis that unpacks the formal and informal institutions and actors that structure opportunities and barriers to adaptive actions. The rights framing exposes the processes of marginalisation and exclusion that lead to differentiation in adaptive capacity, but at the same time helps identify concrete actions that can be taken as part of a rights-based approach to development support for adaptive capacity. The tool and empirical illustration support an emerging body of thought that adaptive capacity requires development actors to engage not only with the technical challenges of responding to climate change, but also with the social and political context that determines the distribution of costs and benefits.

U2 - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.005

DO - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.005

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 38

EP - 49

JO - Global Environmental Change

T2 - Global Environmental Change

JF - Global Environmental Change

SN - 0959-3780

ER -