TY - JOUR
T1 - A self-aligning prosthetic device for older patients with vascular-related amputations: Protocol for a randomised feasibility study (the STEPFORWARD study)
AU - Mitchell, Natasha
AU - Coleman, Izzy
AU - Watson, Judith M
AU - Bell, Kerry Jane
AU - McDaid, Catriona Maria
AU - Barnett, Cleveland
AU - Twiste, Martin
AU - Jepson, Fergus
AU - Salawu, Abayomi
AU - Harrison, Dennis
AU - Vanicek, Natalie
N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019.
PY - 2019/9/20
Y1 - 2019/9/20
N2 - Introduction The majority of older patients with a transtibial amputation are prescribed a standard (more rigid, not self-aligning) prosthesis. These are mostly suitable for level walking, and cannot adjust to different sloped surfaces. This makes walking more difficult and less energy efficient, possibly leading to longer term disuse. A Cochrane Review concluded there was insufficient evidence to recommend any individual type of prosthetic ankle-foot mechanism. This trial will establish the feasibility of conducting a large scale trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a self-aligning prosthesis for older patients with vascular-related amputations and other health issues, compared to a standard prosthesis.Methods and analysisThis feasibility trial is a pragmatic, parallel group, randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing standard treatment with a more rigid prosthesis versus a self-aligning prosthesis. The target sample size is 90 patients, who are aged 50 and over, and have a transtibial amputation, where amputation aetiology is mostly vascular-related or non-traumatic. Feasibility will be measured by: consent and retention rates, a plausible future sample size over a 24-month recruitment period, and completeness of outcome measures. Qualitative interviews will be carried out with trial participants to explore issues around study processes and acceptability of the intervention. Focus groups with staff at prosthetics centres will explore barriers to successful delivery of the trial. Findings from the qualitative work will be integrated with the feasibility trial outcomes in order to inform the design of a full-scale RCT.Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was granted by Yorkshire & the Humber - Leeds West Research Ethics Committee on 4 May 2018. The findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed research publications, articles in relevant newsletters, presentations at relevant conferences and the patient advisory group. Trial registration ISRCTN15043643 Keywords Randomised controlled trial, feasibility, amputation, prosthesis, acceptability, vascular Protocol versionVersion 1.3, 27th November 2018
AB - Introduction The majority of older patients with a transtibial amputation are prescribed a standard (more rigid, not self-aligning) prosthesis. These are mostly suitable for level walking, and cannot adjust to different sloped surfaces. This makes walking more difficult and less energy efficient, possibly leading to longer term disuse. A Cochrane Review concluded there was insufficient evidence to recommend any individual type of prosthetic ankle-foot mechanism. This trial will establish the feasibility of conducting a large scale trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a self-aligning prosthesis for older patients with vascular-related amputations and other health issues, compared to a standard prosthesis.Methods and analysisThis feasibility trial is a pragmatic, parallel group, randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing standard treatment with a more rigid prosthesis versus a self-aligning prosthesis. The target sample size is 90 patients, who are aged 50 and over, and have a transtibial amputation, where amputation aetiology is mostly vascular-related or non-traumatic. Feasibility will be measured by: consent and retention rates, a plausible future sample size over a 24-month recruitment period, and completeness of outcome measures. Qualitative interviews will be carried out with trial participants to explore issues around study processes and acceptability of the intervention. Focus groups with staff at prosthetics centres will explore barriers to successful delivery of the trial. Findings from the qualitative work will be integrated with the feasibility trial outcomes in order to inform the design of a full-scale RCT.Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was granted by Yorkshire & the Humber - Leeds West Research Ethics Committee on 4 May 2018. The findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed research publications, articles in relevant newsletters, presentations at relevant conferences and the patient advisory group. Trial registration ISRCTN15043643 Keywords Randomised controlled trial, feasibility, amputation, prosthesis, acceptability, vascular Protocol versionVersion 1.3, 27th November 2018
UR - https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/9/9/e032924.full.pdf
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032924
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032924
M3 - Article
SN - 2044-6055
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
ER -