By the same authors

From the same journal

A uniform measurement expression for cross method comparison of nanoparticle aggregate size distributions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

  • Agnieszka Dudkiewicz
  • Stephan Wagner
  • Angela Lehner
  • Qasim Chaudhry
  • Stéphane Pietravalle
  • Karen Tiede
  • Alistair B A Boxall
  • Guenter Allmaier
  • Dirk Tiede
  • Ringo Grombe
  • Frank von der Kammer
  • Thilo Hofmann
  • Kristian Mølhave

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalAnalyst
DateE-pub ahead of print - 9 Jun 2015
DatePublished (current) - 2015
Early online date9/06/15
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Available measurement methods for nanomaterials are based on very different measurement principles and hence produce different values when used on aggregated nanoparticle dispersions. This paper provides a solution for relating measurements of nanomaterials comprised of nanoparticle aggregates determined by different techniques using a uniform expression of a mass equivalent diameter (MED). The obtained solution is used to transform into MED the size distributions of the same sample of synthetic amorphous silica (nanomaterial comprising aggregated nanoparticles) measured by six different techniques: scanning electron microscopy in both high vacuum (SEM) and liquid cell setup (Wet-SEM); gas-phase electrophoretic mobility molecular analyzer (GEMMA); centrifugal liquid sedimentation (CLS); nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA); and asymmetric flow field flow fractionation with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry detection (AF4-ICP-MS). Transformed size distributions are then compared between the methods and conclusions drawn on methods' measurement accuracy, limits of detection and quantification related to the synthetic amorphous silca's size. Two out of the six tested methods (GEMMA and AF4-ICP-MS) cross validate the MED distributions between each other, providing a true measurement. The measurement accuracy of other four techniques is shown to be compromised either by the high limit of detection and quantification (CLS, NTA, Wet-SEM) or the sample preparation that is biased by increased retention of smaller nanomaterials (SEM). This study thereby presents a successful and conclusive cross-method comparison of size distribution measurements of aggregated nanomaterials. The authors recommend the uniform MED size expression for application in nanomaterial risk assessment studies and clarifications in current regulations and definitions concerning nanomaterials.

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations