Accountable to whom? Data transparency, depoliticisation and the myth of the market in English local government

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

Title of host publicationLocal Governments in the Digital Era
DateAccepted/In press - 4 May 2016
DatePublished (current) - 2017
Pages187-202
PublisherNova Science Publishers
Place of PublicationNew York
Original languageEnglish
ISBN (Print)978-1-63485-891-5

Abstract

Data transparency and structural reforms are changing the nature of accountability in public services across the developed world, and English local government is no exception. Various central government initiatives since 2010 have increased the number of mechanisms through which councils can be held accountable, in line with a promise to improve ‘downwards’ accountability to citizens. However, these mechanisms are unlikely to be any more robust than their predecessors in improving this relationship. Instead, the reforms have actually strengthened ‘upwards’ accountability to central government for financial management, and sought (albeit largely unsuccessfully) to make local public bodies more responsive ‘horizontally’ to potential competitors in the public services marketplace. Indeed, since they are likely to result in greater outsourcing and privatisation of public services, the reforms can be seen as part of a wider neoliberal agenda that is contributing to ‘depoliticisation’ and a situation where policy decisions are taken increasingly by non-state or apolitical actors, to the detriment of democracy and public accountability.

Bibliographical note

Self-archiving of author accepted manuscript not supported by the publisher.

    Research areas

  • accountability, transparency, New Public Management, local government, depoliticisation, England

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations