TY - JOUR
T1 - Addressing climate change with behavioral science
T2 - A global intervention tournament in 63 countries
AU - Climate Collaboration
AU - Vlasceanu, Madalina
AU - Doell, Kimberly C
AU - Bak-Coleman, Joseph B
AU - Todorova, Boryana
AU - Berkebile-Weinberg, Michael M
AU - Grayson, Samantha J
AU - Patel, Yash
AU - Goldwert, Danielle
AU - Pei, Yifei
AU - Chakroff, Alek
AU - Pronizius, Ekaterina
AU - van den Broek, Karlijn L
AU - Vlasceanu, Denisa
AU - Constantino, Sara
AU - Morais, Michael J
AU - Schumann, Philipp
AU - Rathje, Steve
AU - Fang, Ke
AU - Aglioti, Salvatore Maria
AU - Alfano, Mark
AU - Alvarado-Yepez, Andy J
AU - Andersen, Angélica
AU - Anseel, Frederik
AU - Apps, Matthew A J
AU - Asadli, Chillar
AU - Awuor, Fonda Jane
AU - Azevedo, Flavio
AU - Basaglia, Piero
AU - Bélanger, Jocelyn J
AU - Berger, Sebastian
AU - Bertin, Paul
AU - Białek, Michał
AU - Bialobrzeska, Olga
AU - Blaya-Burgo, Michelle
AU - Bleize, Daniëlle N M
AU - Bø, Simen
AU - Boecker, Lea
AU - Boggio, Paulo S
AU - Borau, Sylvie
AU - Bos, Björn
AU - Bouguettaya, Ayoub
AU - Brauer, Markus
AU - Brick, Cameron
AU - Brik, Tymofii
AU - Briker, Roman
AU - Brosch, Tobias
AU - Buchel, Ondrej
AU - Buonauro, Daniel
AU - Butalia, Radhika
AU - Grigoryan, Lusine
N1 - © 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/2/7
Y1 - 2024/2/7
N2 - Effectively reducing climate change requires marked, global behavior change. However, it is unclear which strategies are most likely to motivate people to change their climate beliefs and behaviors. Here, we tested 11 expert-crowdsourced interventions on four climate mitigation outcomes: beliefs, policy support, information sharing intention, and an effortful tree-planting behavioral task. Across 59,440 participants from 63 countries, the interventions' effectiveness was small, largely limited to nonclimate skeptics, and differed across outcomes: Beliefs were strengthened mostly by decreasing psychological distance (by 2.3%), policy support by writing a letter to a future-generation member (2.6%), information sharing by negative emotion induction (12.1%), and no intervention increased the more effortful behavior-several interventions even reduced tree planting. Last, the effects of each intervention differed depending on people's initial climate beliefs. These findings suggest that the impact of behavioral climate interventions varies across audiences and target behaviors.
AB - Effectively reducing climate change requires marked, global behavior change. However, it is unclear which strategies are most likely to motivate people to change their climate beliefs and behaviors. Here, we tested 11 expert-crowdsourced interventions on four climate mitigation outcomes: beliefs, policy support, information sharing intention, and an effortful tree-planting behavioral task. Across 59,440 participants from 63 countries, the interventions' effectiveness was small, largely limited to nonclimate skeptics, and differed across outcomes: Beliefs were strengthened mostly by decreasing psychological distance (by 2.3%), policy support by writing a letter to a future-generation member (2.6%), information sharing by negative emotion induction (12.1%), and no intervention increased the more effortful behavior-several interventions even reduced tree planting. Last, the effects of each intervention differed depending on people's initial climate beliefs. These findings suggest that the impact of behavioral climate interventions varies across audiences and target behaviors.
KW - Humans
KW - Climate Change
KW - Intention
KW - Policy
KW - Behavioral Sciences
U2 - 10.1126/sciadv.adj5778
DO - 10.1126/sciadv.adj5778
M3 - Article
C2 - 38324680
SN - 2375-2548
VL - 10
SP - eadj5778
JO - Science Advances
JF - Science Advances
IS - 6
ER -