After post-cognitivism

C  Kitzinger

doi:10.1177/1461445606059556

After post-cognitivism

C Kitzinger

Department of Sociology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This article briefly considers the convergence and divergence between Discursive Psychology (DP) and Conversation Analysis (CA), in relation to cognition in talk-in-interaction. It explores the possibilities for research that begins from, rather than argues for, a post-cognitive perspective. Drawing in particular on an analysis of a single fragment of conversation, I suggest three analytic areas for researchers concerned both with talk-in-interaction and with cognition: i) the social organization of cognitive displays and embodiments; ii) the (re)production of taken-for-granted culture through 'internalized social norms'; iii) cognitions (e.g. memories) made manifest in interaction, as the cognitive infrastructure upon which talk-in-interaction depends. After post-cognitivism, research in these areas can contribute both to scholarly understanding of cognition, and to the emerging discipline of CA.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	67-83
Number of pages	17
Journal	Discourse Studies
Volume	8
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059556
Publication status	Published - Feb 2006

Keywords

cognition
conversation analysis
culture
discursive psychology
heteronormativity
interaction
surprise
EMOTION
CONVERSATION
ORGANIZATION
PSYCHOLOGY
DISCOURSE
RESOURCE
CALLS
TALK

Access to Document

10.1177/1461445606059556

Cite this

@article{b3d39f1ec795499888639fa9d6b34b8d,

title = "After post-cognitivism",

abstract = "This article briefly considers the convergence and divergence between Discursive Psychology (DP) and Conversation Analysis (CA), in relation to cognition in talk-in-interaction. It explores the possibilities for research that begins from, rather than argues for, a post-cognitive perspective. Drawing in particular on an analysis of a single fragment of conversation, I suggest three analytic areas for researchers concerned both with talk-in-interaction and with cognition: i) the social organization of cognitive displays and embodiments; ii) the (re)production of taken-for-granted culture through 'internalized social norms'; iii) cognitions (e.g. memories) made manifest in interaction, as the cognitive infrastructure upon which talk-in-interaction depends. After post-cognitivism, research in these areas can contribute both to scholarly understanding of cognition, and to the emerging discipline of CA.",

keywords = "cognition, conversation analysis, culture, discursive psychology, heteronormativity, interaction, surprise, EMOTION, CONVERSATION, ORGANIZATION, PSYCHOLOGY, DISCOURSE, RESOURCE, CALLS, TALK",

author = "C Kitzinger",

year = "2006",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1177/1461445606059556",

language = "English",

volume = "8",

pages = "67--83",

journal = "Discourse Studies",

issn = "1461-4456",

publisher = "SAGE",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - After post-cognitivism

AU - Kitzinger, C

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - This article briefly considers the convergence and divergence between Discursive Psychology (DP) and Conversation Analysis (CA), in relation to cognition in talk-in-interaction. It explores the possibilities for research that begins from, rather than argues for, a post-cognitive perspective. Drawing in particular on an analysis of a single fragment of conversation, I suggest three analytic areas for researchers concerned both with talk-in-interaction and with cognition: i) the social organization of cognitive displays and embodiments; ii) the (re)production of taken-for-granted culture through 'internalized social norms'; iii) cognitions (e.g. memories) made manifest in interaction, as the cognitive infrastructure upon which talk-in-interaction depends. After post-cognitivism, research in these areas can contribute both to scholarly understanding of cognition, and to the emerging discipline of CA.

AB - This article briefly considers the convergence and divergence between Discursive Psychology (DP) and Conversation Analysis (CA), in relation to cognition in talk-in-interaction. It explores the possibilities for research that begins from, rather than argues for, a post-cognitive perspective. Drawing in particular on an analysis of a single fragment of conversation, I suggest three analytic areas for researchers concerned both with talk-in-interaction and with cognition: i) the social organization of cognitive displays and embodiments; ii) the (re)production of taken-for-granted culture through 'internalized social norms'; iii) cognitions (e.g. memories) made manifest in interaction, as the cognitive infrastructure upon which talk-in-interaction depends. After post-cognitivism, research in these areas can contribute both to scholarly understanding of cognition, and to the emerging discipline of CA.

KW - cognition

KW - conversation analysis

KW - culture

KW - discursive psychology

KW - heteronormativity

KW - interaction

KW - surprise

KW - EMOTION

KW - CONVERSATION

KW - ORGANIZATION

KW - PSYCHOLOGY

KW - DISCOURSE

KW - RESOURCE

KW - CALLS

KW - TALK

U2 - 10.1177/1461445606059556

DO - 10.1177/1461445606059556

M3 - Article

SN - 1461-4456

VL - 8

SP - 67

EP - 83

JO - Discourse Studies

JF - Discourse Studies

IS - 1

ER -