All in this together? Austerity and the gender-age gap in the 2015 and 2017 British general elections

Anna Leslie Sanders; Rosalind Shorrocks

doi:10.1177/1369148119864699

All in this together? Austerity and the gender-age gap in the 2015 and 2017 British general elections

Anna Leslie Sanders, Rosalind Shorrocks

Politics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The 2010–2015 Conservative-led Coalition’s austerity policies hit women financially harder than men. However, contrary to expectations at the time, the Conservatives still gained more support from women than men on average in the 2015 general election. We examine the impact of austerity on vote choice in the 2015 and 2017 general elections through analysis of Labour and Conservative economic policy in conjunction with data from the British Election Study’s face-to-face post-election surveys. The expectation that women should be particularly anti-austerity and thus less supportive of the Conservative Party does hold for younger women, who were especially pessimistic relative to their male peers and older age groups about their living costs, household finances, the economy, and the National Health Service in both elections. However, this does not hold for older women, who were protected by the Coalition’s policies on pensions and were more similar to men in their assessment of their economic situation.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	667-688
Number of pages	12
Journal	British Journal of Politics and International Relations
Volume	21
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148119864699
Publication status	Published - 8 Sept 2019

Keywords

Austerity
Gender gaps
Vote choice

Access to Document

10.1177/1369148119864699

Cite this

@article{691ec81c9d13430cab7e1ae66cf3c15a,

title = "All in this together? Austerity and the gender-age gap in the 2015 and 2017 British general elections",

abstract = "The 2010–2015 Conservative-led Coalition{\textquoteright}s austerity policies hit women financially harder than men. However, contrary to expectations at the time, the Conservatives still gained more support from women than men on average in the 2015 general election. We examine the impact of austerity on vote choice in the 2015 and 2017 general elections through analysis of Labour and Conservative economic policy in conjunction with data from the British Election Study{\textquoteright}s face-to-face post-election surveys. The expectation that women should be particularly anti-austerity and thus less supportive of the Conservative Party does hold for younger women, who were especially pessimistic relative to their male peers and older age groups about their living costs, household finances, the economy, and the National Health Service in both elections. However, this does not hold for older women, who were protected by the Coalition{\textquoteright}s policies on pensions and were more similar to men in their assessment of their economic situation.",

keywords = "Austerity, Gender gaps, Vote choice",

author = "Sanders, {Anna Leslie} and Rosalind Shorrocks",

year = "2019",

month = sep,

day = "8",

doi = "10.1177/1369148119864699",

language = "English",

volume = "21",

pages = "667--688",

journal = "British Journal of Politics and International Relations",

issn = "1369-1481",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - All in this together? Austerity and the gender-age gap in the 2015 and 2017 British general elections

AU - Sanders, Anna Leslie

AU - Shorrocks, Rosalind

PY - 2019/9/8

Y1 - 2019/9/8

N2 - The 2010–2015 Conservative-led Coalition’s austerity policies hit women financially harder than men. However, contrary to expectations at the time, the Conservatives still gained more support from women than men on average in the 2015 general election. We examine the impact of austerity on vote choice in the 2015 and 2017 general elections through analysis of Labour and Conservative economic policy in conjunction with data from the British Election Study’s face-to-face post-election surveys. The expectation that women should be particularly anti-austerity and thus less supportive of the Conservative Party does hold for younger women, who were especially pessimistic relative to their male peers and older age groups about their living costs, household finances, the economy, and the National Health Service in both elections. However, this does not hold for older women, who were protected by the Coalition’s policies on pensions and were more similar to men in their assessment of their economic situation.

AB - The 2010–2015 Conservative-led Coalition’s austerity policies hit women financially harder than men. However, contrary to expectations at the time, the Conservatives still gained more support from women than men on average in the 2015 general election. We examine the impact of austerity on vote choice in the 2015 and 2017 general elections through analysis of Labour and Conservative economic policy in conjunction with data from the British Election Study’s face-to-face post-election surveys. The expectation that women should be particularly anti-austerity and thus less supportive of the Conservative Party does hold for younger women, who were especially pessimistic relative to their male peers and older age groups about their living costs, household finances, the economy, and the National Health Service in both elections. However, this does not hold for older women, who were protected by the Coalition’s policies on pensions and were more similar to men in their assessment of their economic situation.

KW - Austerity

KW - Gender gaps

KW - Vote choice

U2 - 10.1177/1369148119864699

DO - 10.1177/1369148119864699

M3 - Article

SN - 1369-1481

VL - 21

SP - 667

EP - 688

JO - British Journal of Politics and International Relations

JF - British Journal of Politics and International Relations

IS - 4

ER -