An improved low-power measurement of ambient NO 2 and O 3 combining electrochemical sensor clusters and machine learning

Kate R. Smith, Peter M. Edwards*, Peter D. Ivatt, James D. Lee, Freya Squires, Chengliang Dai, Richard E. Peltier, Mat J. Evans, Yele Sun, Alastair C. Lewis

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Low-cost sensors (LCSs) are an appealing solution to the problem of spatial resolution in air quality measurement, but they currently do not have the same analytical performance as regulatory reference methods. Individual sensors can be susceptible to analytical cross-interferences; have random signal variability; and experience drift over short, medium and long timescales. To overcome some of the performance limitations of individual sensors we use a clustering approach using the instantaneous median signal from six identical electrochemical sensors to minimize the randomized drifts and inter-sensor differences. We report here on a low-power analytical device (<200 W) that is comprised of clusters of sensors for NO 2 , O x , CO and total volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and that measures supporting parameters such as water vapour and temperature. This was tested in the field against reference monitors, collecting ambient air pollution data in Beijing, China. Comparisons were made of NO 2 and O x clustered sensor data against reference methods for calibrations derived from factory settings, in-field simple linear regression (SLR) and then against three machine learning (ML) algorithms. The parametric supervised ML algorithms, boosted regression trees (BRTs) and boosted linear regression (BLR), and the non-parametric technique, Gaussian process (GP), used all available sensor data to improve the measurement estimate of NO 2 and O x . In all cases ML produced an observational value that was closer to reference measurements than SLR alone. In combination, sensor clustering and ML generated sensor data of a quality that was close to that of regulatory measurements (using the RMSE metric) yet retained a very substantial cost and power advantage.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1325-1336
Number of pages12
JournalAtmospheric Measurement Techniques
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 28 Feb 2019

Bibliographical note

© Author(s) 2019

Cite this