Abstract
Attempts by external agencies to intervene in the operation of local resource exploitation strategies frequently include reference to historical arguments. These vary in accuracy and sophistication but are nevertheless rhetorically useful since discussions of economic or environmental sustainability or degradation are substantially strengthened by historical comparisons and precedents. Focussing on examples of indigenous intensive agriculture in eastern Africa, this paper agues that relevant evidence of this sort is often unavailable or far from unambiguous. It is therefore necessary to be critical of the ways in which perceptions of the past are invoked within these discourses, and to be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of historical arguments in this regard. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1251-1262 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | World Development |
Volume | 38 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2010 |
Keywords
- historical ecology
- archeology
- intensive agriculture
- indigenous knowledge
- east Africa
- AGRICULTURAL HISTORY
- APPLIED ANTHROPOLOGY
- USAMBARA MOUNTAINS
- SOIL-CONSERVATION
- COVER CHANGE
- TANZANIA
- KNOWLEDGE
- KENYA
- ENVIRONMENT
- IRRIGATION