By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Archaeology and contemporary death: Using the past to provoke, challenge and engage

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Archaeology and contemporary death : Using the past to provoke, challenge and engage. / Croucher, Karina; Buster, Lindsey Sarah; Dayes, Jennifer; Green, Laura; Raynsford, Justine; Comerford Boyes, Louise; Faull, Christina.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 15, No. 12, e0244058, 29.12.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Croucher, K, Buster, LS, Dayes, J, Green, L, Raynsford, J, Comerford Boyes, L & Faull, C 2020, 'Archaeology and contemporary death: Using the past to provoke, challenge and engage', PLoS ONE, vol. 15, no. 12, e0244058. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244058

APA

Croucher, K., Buster, L. S., Dayes, J., Green, L., Raynsford, J., Comerford Boyes, L., & Faull, C. (2020). Archaeology and contemporary death: Using the past to provoke, challenge and engage. PLoS ONE, 15(12), [e0244058]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244058

Vancouver

Croucher K, Buster LS, Dayes J, Green L, Raynsford J, Comerford Boyes L et al. Archaeology and contemporary death: Using the past to provoke, challenge and engage. PLoS ONE. 2020 Dec 29;15(12). e0244058. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244058

Author

Croucher, Karina ; Buster, Lindsey Sarah ; Dayes, Jennifer ; Green, Laura ; Raynsford, Justine ; Comerford Boyes, Louise ; Faull, Christina. / Archaeology and contemporary death : Using the past to provoke, challenge and engage. In: PLoS ONE. 2020 ; Vol. 15, No. 12.

Bibtex - Download

@article{beed90dac1dc440b9dfd8abe1056090e,
title = "Archaeology and contemporary death: Using the past to provoke, challenge and engage",
abstract = "While death is universal, reactions to death and ways of dealing with the dead body are hugely diverse, and archaeological research reveals numerous ways of dealing with the dead through time and across the world. In this paper, findings are presented which not only demonstrate the power of archaeology to promote and aid discussion around this difficult and challenging topic, but also how our approach resulted in personal growth and professional development impacts for participants. In this interdisciplinary pilot study, archaeological case studies were used in 31 structured workshops with 187 participants from health and social care backgrounds in the UK, to explore their reactions to a diverse range of materials which documented wide and varied approaches to death and the dead. Our study supports the hypothesis that the past is a powerful instigator of conversation around challenging aspects of death, and after death care and practices: 93% of participants agreed with this. That exposure to archaeological case studies and artefacts stimulates multifaceted discourse, some of it difficult, is a theme that also emerges in our data from pre, post and follow-up questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews. The material prompted participants to reflect on their biases, expectations and norms around both treatment of the dead, and of bereavement, impacting on their values, attitudes and beliefs. Moreover, 87% of participants believed the workshop would have a personal effect through thinking differently about death and bereavement, and 57% thought it would impact on how they approached death and bereavement in their professional practice. This has huge implications today, where talk of death remains troublesome, and for some, has a near-taboo status–{\textquoteleft}taboo{\textquoteright} being a theme evident in some participants{\textquoteright} own words. The findings have an important role to play in facilitating and normalising discussions around dying and bereavement and in equipping professionals in their work with people with advanced illness.",
author = "Karina Croucher and Buster, {Lindsey Sarah} and Jennifer Dayes and Laura Green and Justine Raynsford and {Comerford Boyes}, Louise and Christina Faull",
note = "{\textcopyright}2020 Croucher et al.",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
day = "29",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0244058",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "12",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Archaeology and contemporary death

T2 - Using the past to provoke, challenge and engage

AU - Croucher, Karina

AU - Buster, Lindsey Sarah

AU - Dayes, Jennifer

AU - Green, Laura

AU - Raynsford, Justine

AU - Comerford Boyes, Louise

AU - Faull, Christina

N1 - ©2020 Croucher et al.

PY - 2020/12/29

Y1 - 2020/12/29

N2 - While death is universal, reactions to death and ways of dealing with the dead body are hugely diverse, and archaeological research reveals numerous ways of dealing with the dead through time and across the world. In this paper, findings are presented which not only demonstrate the power of archaeology to promote and aid discussion around this difficult and challenging topic, but also how our approach resulted in personal growth and professional development impacts for participants. In this interdisciplinary pilot study, archaeological case studies were used in 31 structured workshops with 187 participants from health and social care backgrounds in the UK, to explore their reactions to a diverse range of materials which documented wide and varied approaches to death and the dead. Our study supports the hypothesis that the past is a powerful instigator of conversation around challenging aspects of death, and after death care and practices: 93% of participants agreed with this. That exposure to archaeological case studies and artefacts stimulates multifaceted discourse, some of it difficult, is a theme that also emerges in our data from pre, post and follow-up questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews. The material prompted participants to reflect on their biases, expectations and norms around both treatment of the dead, and of bereavement, impacting on their values, attitudes and beliefs. Moreover, 87% of participants believed the workshop would have a personal effect through thinking differently about death and bereavement, and 57% thought it would impact on how they approached death and bereavement in their professional practice. This has huge implications today, where talk of death remains troublesome, and for some, has a near-taboo status–‘taboo’ being a theme evident in some participants’ own words. The findings have an important role to play in facilitating and normalising discussions around dying and bereavement and in equipping professionals in their work with people with advanced illness.

AB - While death is universal, reactions to death and ways of dealing with the dead body are hugely diverse, and archaeological research reveals numerous ways of dealing with the dead through time and across the world. In this paper, findings are presented which not only demonstrate the power of archaeology to promote and aid discussion around this difficult and challenging topic, but also how our approach resulted in personal growth and professional development impacts for participants. In this interdisciplinary pilot study, archaeological case studies were used in 31 structured workshops with 187 participants from health and social care backgrounds in the UK, to explore their reactions to a diverse range of materials which documented wide and varied approaches to death and the dead. Our study supports the hypothesis that the past is a powerful instigator of conversation around challenging aspects of death, and after death care and practices: 93% of participants agreed with this. That exposure to archaeological case studies and artefacts stimulates multifaceted discourse, some of it difficult, is a theme that also emerges in our data from pre, post and follow-up questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews. The material prompted participants to reflect on their biases, expectations and norms around both treatment of the dead, and of bereavement, impacting on their values, attitudes and beliefs. Moreover, 87% of participants believed the workshop would have a personal effect through thinking differently about death and bereavement, and 57% thought it would impact on how they approached death and bereavement in their professional practice. This has huge implications today, where talk of death remains troublesome, and for some, has a near-taboo status–‘taboo’ being a theme evident in some participants’ own words. The findings have an important role to play in facilitating and normalising discussions around dying and bereavement and in equipping professionals in their work with people with advanced illness.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0244058

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0244058

M3 - Article

VL - 15

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 12

M1 - e0244058

ER -