By the same authors

Are You Open? A Content Analysis of Transparency and Openness Guidelines in HCI Journals

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Full text download(s)

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

Title of host publicationCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21),
DateAccepted/In press - 21 Jan 2021
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Within the wider open science reform movement, HCI researchers are actively debating how to foster transparency in their own field. Publication venues play a crucial role in instituting open science practices, especially journals, whose procedures arguably lend themselves better to them than conferences. Yet we know lit- tle about how much HCI journals presently support open science practices. We identified the 51 most frequently published-in jour- nals by recent CHI first authors and coded them according to the Transparency and Openness Promotion guidelines, a high-profile standard of evaluating editorial practices. Results indicate that jour- nals in our sample currently do not set or specify clear openness and transparency standards. Out of a maximum of 29, the modal score was 0 (mean = 2.5, SD = 3.6, max = 15). We discuss potential reasons, the aptness of natural science-based guidelines for HCI, and next steps for the HCI community in furthering openness and transparency.

Bibliographical note

This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.

Projects

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations