By the same authors

From the same journal

Assessing the impact of the Barbados sugar-sweetened beverage tax on beverage sales: An observational study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Full text download(s)

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

  • Miriam Alvarado
  • Nigel Unwin
  • Stephen J. Sharp
  • Ian Hambleton
  • Madhuvanti M. Murphy
  • T. Alafia Samuels
  • Marc Suhrcke
  • Jean Adams

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
DateAccepted/In press - 22 Jan 2019
DatePublished (current) - 30 Jan 2019
Issue number1
Volume16
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization has advocated for sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxes as part of a broader non-communicable disease prevention strategy, and these taxes have been recently introduced in a wide range of settings. However, much is still unknown about how SSB taxes operate in various contexts and as a result of different tax designs. In 2015, the Government of Barbados implemented a 10% ad valorem (value-based) tax on SSBs. It has been hypothesized that this tax structure may inadvertently encourage consumers to switch to cheaper sugary drinks. We aimed to assess whether and to what extent there has been a change in sales of SSBs following implementation of the SSB tax. Methods: We used electronic point of sale data from a major grocery store chain and applied an interrupted time series (ITS) design to assess grocery store SSB and non-SSB sales from January 2013 to October 2016. We controlled for the underlying time trend, seasonality, inflation, tourism and holidays. We conducted sensitivity analyses using a cross-country control (Trinidad and Tobago) and a within-country control (vinegar). We included a post-hoc stratification by price tertile to assess the extent to which consumers may switch to cheaper sugary drinks. Results: We found that average weekly sales of SSBs decreased by 4.3% (95%CI 3.6 to 4.9%) compared to expected sales without a tax, primarily driven by a decrease in carbonated SSBs sales of 3.6% (95%CI 2.9 to 4.4%). Sales of non-SSBs increased by 5.2% (95%CI 4.5 to 5.9%), with bottled water sales increasing by an average of 7.5% (95%CI 6.5 to 8.3%). The sensitivity analyses were consistent with the uncontrolled results. After stratifying by price, we found evidence of substitution to cheaper SSBs. Conclusions: This study suggests that the Barbados SSB tax was associated with decreased sales of SSBs in a major grocery store chain after controlling for underlying trends. This finding was robust to sensitivity analyses. We found evidence to suggest that consumers may have changed their behaviour in response to the tax by purchasing cheaper sugary drinks, in addition to substituting to untaxed products. This has important implications for the design of future SSB taxes.

Bibliographical note

© 2019 The Author(s).

    Research areas

  • Diabetes prevention, Evaluation, Fiscal policy, Obesity prevention, Sugar-sweetened beverages

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations