Author Correction: Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine patches for smoking cessation in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial (Nature Medicine, (2022), 28, 5, (958-964), 10.1038/s41591-022-01808-0)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Author Correction

T2 - Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine patches for smoking cessation in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial (Nature Medicine, (2022), 28, 5, (958-964), 10.1038/s41591-022-01808-0)

AU - Hajek, Peter

AU - Przulj, Dunja

AU - Pesola, Francesca

AU - Griffiths, Chris

AU - Walton, Robert

AU - McRobbie, Hayden

AU - Coleman, Tim

AU - Lewis, Sarah

AU - Whitemore, Rachel

AU - Clark, Miranda

AU - Ussher, Michael

AU - Sinclair, Lesley

AU - Seager, Emily

AU - Cooper, Sue

AU - Bauld, Linda

AU - Naughton, Felix

AU - Sasieni, Peter

AU - Manyonda, Isaac

AU - Myers Smith, Katie

N1 - Funding Information: The acknowledgements were missing the sentence “For part of the trial, F.P. was supported by Cancer Research UK (grant no. C8162/A25356).” Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s).

PY - 2023/11

Y1 - 2023/11

N2 - In the version of this article initially published, there was an incorrect statistic in the “Secondary outcomes” section of the Results: “63 of 171” should have read “63 of 571.” In the “Study arms” section of the Methods, “18%” should have read “1.8%” and “11%” should have read “1.1%.” The affiliation for Peter Sasieni was incorrectly listed as “Kings Clinical Trials Unit, Kings College London, London, UK” instead of “The Cancer Research UK and King’s College London Cancer Prevention Trials Unit, King’s College London, London, UK.” The acknowledgements were missing the sentence “For part of the trial, F.P. was supported by Cancer Research UK (grant no. C8162/A25356).” The changes have been made to the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

AB - In the version of this article initially published, there was an incorrect statistic in the “Secondary outcomes” section of the Results: “63 of 171” should have read “63 of 571.” In the “Study arms” section of the Methods, “18%” should have read “1.8%” and “11%” should have read “1.1%.” The affiliation for Peter Sasieni was incorrectly listed as “Kings Clinical Trials Unit, Kings College London, London, UK” instead of “The Cancer Research UK and King’s College London Cancer Prevention Trials Unit, King’s College London, London, UK.” The acknowledgements were missing the sentence “For part of the trial, F.P. was supported by Cancer Research UK (grant no. C8162/A25356).” The changes have been made to the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141529445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41591-022-02099-1

DO - 10.1038/s41591-022-02099-1

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 36344702

AN - SCOPUS:85141529445

SN - 1078-8956

VL - 29

SP - 2957

JO - Nature Medicine

JF - Nature Medicine

IS - 11

ER -