‘Because the kills all count the same’: Accounting for death in the Vietnam War

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘Because the kills all count the same’

T2 - Accounting for death in the Vietnam War

AU - McCann, Leo

N1 - This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the University’s Research Publications and Open Access policy.

PY - 2024/11/4

Y1 - 2024/11/4

N2 - The United States’ military campaign in Vietnam was supposedly a ‘limited’ war. Calculative practices were vital for military and civilian leaders in managing the conflict and claiming progress against objectives. The most infamous accounting measure was ‘body count’; one of many performance indicators used by the U.S. military in a conflict deeply influenced by the logics and practices of war managerialism. This paper explores an important example of Vietnam-era calculative practices - Sharpening the Combat Edge; a 1974 U.S. Army handbook that provides a tangential history of the war in the Mekong Delta, while offering military commanders practical systems to ‘aid decision-making’ in current and future conflicts. Drawing on the concepts of accounting for death and war managerialism, the paper deconstructs the textual and numeric accounting practices marshalled in this text. It argues that Sharpening is a powerful example of the legitimating roles that accounting for death can play in promoting and normalising state violence.

AB - The United States’ military campaign in Vietnam was supposedly a ‘limited’ war. Calculative practices were vital for military and civilian leaders in managing the conflict and claiming progress against objectives. The most infamous accounting measure was ‘body count’; one of many performance indicators used by the U.S. military in a conflict deeply influenced by the logics and practices of war managerialism. This paper explores an important example of Vietnam-era calculative practices - Sharpening the Combat Edge; a 1974 U.S. Army handbook that provides a tangential history of the war in the Mekong Delta, while offering military commanders practical systems to ‘aid decision-making’ in current and future conflicts. Drawing on the concepts of accounting for death and war managerialism, the paper deconstructs the textual and numeric accounting practices marshalled in this text. It argues that Sharpening is a powerful example of the legitimating roles that accounting for death can play in promoting and normalising state violence.

KW - Vietnam War

KW - Managerialism

KW - U.S. Military

KW - Accounting

KW - Calculative Practices

M3 - Article

SN - 1032-3732

JO - Accounting History

JF - Accounting History

ER -