Bootstrapping the Battle of Britain

Brennen Taylor Fagan, Ian Horwood, Niall James MacKay, Christopher Price, Edward Richards, Andrew James Wood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


The Battle of Britain is the focus of much historical controversy. We show here how the statistical technique of weighted bootstrapping can be used to create a new quantitative basis to help address such controversies. Bootstrapping facilitates the exploration of alternative campaign possibilities with different tactics. This results in comparative probabilities of “victory” for the actual and various counterfactual campaigns, providing a quantified assessment of the likelihood of German achievement of air superiority, thereby facilitating invasion. We find this more likely had the Luftwaffe targeted airfields more heavily, and greatly more likely had Germany brought forward its air campaign.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151-186
JournalThe Journal of Military History
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020

Bibliographical note

© [year], [owner]. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details

Cite this