Bound Together: Social binding leads to faster processing, spatial distortion and enhanced memory of interacting partners.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


The binding of features into perceptual wholes is a well-established phenomenon, which has previously only been studied in the context of early vision and low-level features, such as colour or proximity. We hypothesised that a similar binding process, based on higher level information, could bind people into interacting groups, facilitating faster processing and enhanced memory of social situations. To investigate this possibility we used three experimental approaches to explore grouping effects in displays involving interacting people. First, using a visual search task we demonstrate more rapid processing for interacting (versus non-interacting) pairs in an odd-quadrant paradigm (Experiments 1a & 1b). Second, using a spatial judgment task, we show that interacting individuals are remembered as physically closer than are non-interacting individuals (Experiments 2a & 2b). Finally, we show that memory retention of group- relevant and irrelevant features is enhanced when recalling interacting partners in a surprise memory task (Experiments 3a & 3b). Each of these results is consistent with the social binding hypothesis, and alternative explanations based on low level perceptual features and attentional effects are ruled out. We conclude that automatic mid-level grouping processes bind individuals into groups on the basis of their perceived interaction. Such social binding could provide the basis for more sophisticated social processing. Identifying the automatic encoding of social interactions in visual search, distortions of spatial working memory, and facilitated retrieval of object properties from longer-term memory, opens new approaches to studying social cognition with possible practical applications.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1251-1268
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Issue number7
Early online date17 Jan 2019
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019

Bibliographical note

© 2019 American Psychological Association. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.

Cite this