Caregiver assessment of support need, reaction to care, and assessment of depression

Diane Jorgensen, Hilary Arksey, Matthew Parsons, Stephen Jacobs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The aims of this study were to: (a) identify New Zealand informal carers' support needs, (b) assess caregivers' depression, and (c) assess positive and negative aspects of caregiving. A sample of 287 carers from throughout New Zealand was recruited by advertisements in carer support organizations literature, in 2008. Data were collected using Centre for Epidemiologic Short Depression scale (CES-D10), Caregivers Reaction Assessment scale (CRA), and open-ended questions. Carer burden was significant in the 60 to 69 age group. The relationship between CRA and CES-D10 in carers in the 50 to 59, 60 to 69 carer age groups, and 0 to 29, 60 to 69, 70 to 79, and 80 plus care recipient age groups were also significant. Mean burden was highest in the 50 to 59 age group (77/120) with depression mean highest in the 30 to 39 age group (14/30). Carers commonly discussed the adverse effects of caregiving on identity, lifestyle, health, and financial situation. Lack of information, poor respite care, and combining work with care were major frustrations. If the government wishes to successfully pursue initiatives allowing people to remain at home, more resources are needed to adequately support carers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)130-150
Number of pages21
JournalHome Health Care Services Quarterly
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Bibliographical note

This is an author produced version of the article published. This paper has been peer-reviewed but does not include the journal pagination. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Link to the online version: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a920116862~frm=titlelink DOI: 10.1080/01621420903579768

Keywords

  • carers
  • social care services issues
  • health services issues
  • funding issues

Cite this