Abstract
Experts at modelling constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) carefully choose model transformations to reduce greatly the amount of effort that is required to solve a problem by systematic search. It is a considerable challenge to automate such transformations and to identify which transformations are useful. Transformations include adding constraints that are implied by other constraints, adding constraints that eliminate symmetrical solutions, removing redundant constraints and replacing constraints with their logical equivalents. This paper describes the CGRASS (Constraint Generation And Symmetry-breaking) system that can improve a problem model by automatically performing transformations of these kinds. We focus here on transforming individual CSP instances. Experiments on the Golomb ruler problem suggest that producing good problem formulations solely by transforming problem instances is, generally, infeasible. We argue that, in certain cases, it is better to transform the problem class than individual instances and, furthermore, it can sometimes be better to transform formulations of a problem that are more abstract than a CSP.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | RECENT ADVANCES IN CONSTRAINTS |
Editors | B OSullivan |
Place of Publication | BERLIN |
Publisher | Springer |
Pages | 15-30 |
Number of pages | 16 |
ISBN (Print) | 3-540-00986-8 |
Publication status | Published - 2003 |
Event | Joint ERCIM/CologNet International Workshop on Constraint Solving and Constraint Logic Programming - CORK Duration: 19 Jun 2002 → 21 Jun 2002 |
Conference
Conference | Joint ERCIM/CologNet International Workshop on Constraint Solving and Constraint Logic Programming |
---|---|
City | CORK |
Period | 19/06/02 → 21/06/02 |