Chapter 1: Overview and summary

M. Shimada; D.J. Campbell; V. Mukhovatov; A.E. Costley; Y. Gribov; A. Polevoi; A. Loarte; M. Fujiwara; N. Kirneva; V.D. Pustovitov; K. Lackner; O. Gruber; A.C.C. Sips; M. Nagami; N. Asakura; S. Ide; Y. Kamada; N. Uckan; W. Houlberg; J. Wesley; A. Leonard; T.H. Osborne; A.J.H. Donné; E.J. Doyle; A. Fasoli; C. Gormezano; T.C. Hender; B. Lipschultz; K. Miyamoto

doi:10.1088/0029-5515/47/6/S01

Chapter 1: Overview and summary

M. Shimada, D.J. Campbell, V. Mukhovatov, A.E. Costley, Y. Gribov, A. Polevoi, A. Loarte, M. Fujiwara, N. Kirneva, V.D. Pustovitov, K. Lackner, O. Gruber, A.C.C. Sips, M. Nagami, N. Asakura, S. Ide, Y. Kamada, N. Uckan, W. Houlberg, J. WesleyA. Leonard, T.H. Osborne, A.J.H. Donné, E.J. Doyle, A. Fasoli, C. Gormezano, T.C. Hender, B. Lipschultz, K. Miyamoto

Physics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The 'Progress in the ITER Physics Basis' (PIPB) document is an update of the 'ITER Physics Basis' (IPB), which was published in 1999 [1]. The IPB provided methodologies for projecting the performance of burning plasmas, developed largely through coordinated experimental, modelling and theoretical activities carried out on today's large tokamaks (ITER Physics R&D). In the IPB, projections for ITER (1998 Design) were also presented. The IPB also pointed out some outstanding issues. These issues have been addressed by the Participant Teams of ITER (the European Union, Japan, Russia and the USA), for which International Tokamak Physics Activities (ITPA) provided a forum of scientists, focusing on open issues pointed out in the IPB. The new methodologies of projection and control are applied to ITER, which was redesigned under revised technical objectives. These analyses suggest that the achievement of Q > 10 in the inductive operation is feasible. Further, improved confinement and beta observed with low shear (≤ high β ≤ 'hybrid') operation scenarios, if achieved in ITER, could provide attractive scenarios with high Q (> 10), long pulse (>1000 s) operation with beta

Original language	English
Journal	Nuclear fusion
Volume	47
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/47/6/S01
Publication status	Published - 1 Jun 2007

Access to Document

10.1088/0029-5515/47/6/S01

Cite this

Shimada, M., Campbell, D. J., Mukhovatov, V., Costley, A. E., Gribov, Y., Polevoi, A., Loarte, A., Fujiwara, M., Kirneva, N., Pustovitov, V. D., Lackner, K., Gruber, O., Sips, A. C. C., Nagami, M., Asakura, N., Ide, S., Kamada, Y., Uckan, N., Houlberg, W., ... Miyamoto, K. (2007). Chapter 1: Overview and summary. Nuclear fusion, 47(6). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/47/6/S01

@article{1ffa2ff480eb49c79ac5f83342d1e735,

title = "Chapter 1: Overview and summary",

abstract = "The 'Progress in the ITER Physics Basis' (PIPB) document is an update of the 'ITER Physics Basis' (IPB), which was published in 1999 [1]. The IPB provided methodologies for projecting the performance of burning plasmas, developed largely through coordinated experimental, modelling and theoretical activities carried out on today's large tokamaks (ITER Physics R&D). In the IPB, projections for ITER (1998 Design) were also presented. The IPB also pointed out some outstanding issues. These issues have been addressed by the Participant Teams of ITER (the European Union, Japan, Russia and the USA), for which International Tokamak Physics Activities (ITPA) provided a forum of scientists, focusing on open issues pointed out in the IPB. The new methodologies of projection and control are applied to ITER, which was redesigned under revised technical objectives. These analyses suggest that the achievement of Q > 10 in the inductive operation is feasible. Further, improved confinement and beta observed with low shear (≤ high β ≤ 'hybrid') operation scenarios, if achieved in ITER, could provide attractive scenarios with high Q (> 10), long pulse (>1000 s) operation with beta ",

author = "M. Shimada and D.J. Campbell and V. Mukhovatov and A.E. Costley and Y. Gribov and A. Polevoi and A. Loarte and M. Fujiwara and N. Kirneva and V.D. Pustovitov and K. Lackner and O. Gruber and A.C.C. Sips and M. Nagami and N. Asakura and S. Ide and Y. Kamada and N. Uckan and W. Houlberg and J. Wesley and A. Leonard and T.H. Osborne and A.J.H. Donn{\'e} and E.J. Doyle and A. Fasoli and C. Gormezano and T.C. Hender and B. Lipschultz and K. Miyamoto",

year = "2007",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1088/0029-5515/47/6/S01",

language = "English",

volume = "47",

journal = "Nuclear fusion",

issn = "0029-5515",

publisher = "IOP Publishing",

number = "6",

}

Shimada, M, Campbell, DJ, Mukhovatov, V, Costley, AE, Gribov, Y, Polevoi, A, Loarte, A, Fujiwara, M, Kirneva, N, Pustovitov, VD, Lackner, K, Gruber, O, Sips, ACC, Nagami, M, Asakura, N, Ide, S, Kamada, Y, Uckan, N, Houlberg, W, Wesley, J, Leonard, A, Osborne, TH, Donné, AJH, Doyle, EJ, Fasoli, A, Gormezano, C, Hender, TC, Lipschultz, B & Miyamoto, K 2007, 'Chapter 1: Overview and summary', Nuclear fusion, vol. 47, no. 6. https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/47/6/S01

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chapter 1

T2 - Overview and summary

AU - Shimada, M.

AU - Campbell, D.J.

AU - Mukhovatov, V.

AU - Costley, A.E.

AU - Gribov, Y.

AU - Polevoi, A.

AU - Loarte, A.

AU - Fujiwara, M.

AU - Kirneva, N.

AU - Pustovitov, V.D.

AU - Lackner, K.

AU - Gruber, O.

AU - Sips, A.C.C.

AU - Nagami, M.

AU - Asakura, N.

AU - Ide, S.

AU - Kamada, Y.

AU - Uckan, N.

AU - Houlberg, W.

AU - Wesley, J.

AU - Leonard, A.

AU - Osborne, T.H.

AU - Donné, A.J.H.

AU - Doyle, E.J.

AU - Fasoli, A.

AU - Gormezano, C.

AU - Hender, T.C.

AU - Lipschultz, B.

AU - Miyamoto, K.

PY - 2007/6/1

Y1 - 2007/6/1

N2 - The 'Progress in the ITER Physics Basis' (PIPB) document is an update of the 'ITER Physics Basis' (IPB), which was published in 1999 [1]. The IPB provided methodologies for projecting the performance of burning plasmas, developed largely through coordinated experimental, modelling and theoretical activities carried out on today's large tokamaks (ITER Physics R&D). In the IPB, projections for ITER (1998 Design) were also presented. The IPB also pointed out some outstanding issues. These issues have been addressed by the Participant Teams of ITER (the European Union, Japan, Russia and the USA), for which International Tokamak Physics Activities (ITPA) provided a forum of scientists, focusing on open issues pointed out in the IPB. The new methodologies of projection and control are applied to ITER, which was redesigned under revised technical objectives. These analyses suggest that the achievement of Q > 10 in the inductive operation is feasible. Further, improved confinement and beta observed with low shear (≤ high β ≤ 'hybrid') operation scenarios, if achieved in ITER, could provide attractive scenarios with high Q (> 10), long pulse (>1000 s) operation with beta

AB - The 'Progress in the ITER Physics Basis' (PIPB) document is an update of the 'ITER Physics Basis' (IPB), which was published in 1999 [1]. The IPB provided methodologies for projecting the performance of burning plasmas, developed largely through coordinated experimental, modelling and theoretical activities carried out on today's large tokamaks (ITER Physics R&D). In the IPB, projections for ITER (1998 Design) were also presented. The IPB also pointed out some outstanding issues. These issues have been addressed by the Participant Teams of ITER (the European Union, Japan, Russia and the USA), for which International Tokamak Physics Activities (ITPA) provided a forum of scientists, focusing on open issues pointed out in the IPB. The new methodologies of projection and control are applied to ITER, which was redesigned under revised technical objectives. These analyses suggest that the achievement of Q > 10 in the inductive operation is feasible. Further, improved confinement and beta observed with low shear (≤ high β ≤ 'hybrid') operation scenarios, if achieved in ITER, could provide attractive scenarios with high Q (> 10), long pulse (>1000 s) operation with beta

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34347237246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/0029-5515/47/6/S01

DO - 10.1088/0029-5515/47/6/S01

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34347237246

SN - 0029-5515

VL - 47

JO - Nuclear fusion

JF - Nuclear fusion

IS - 6

ER -

Chapter 1: Overview and summary

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this