Climate change mitigation and nature conservation both require higher protected area targets

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Full text download(s)

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B
DateAccepted/In press - 2 Oct 2019
DatePublished (current) - 27 Jan 2020
Issue number1794
Volume375
Number of pages4
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Nations of the world have, to date, pursued nature protection and climate change mitigation and adaptation policies separately. Both efforts have failed to achieve the scale of action needed to halt biodiversity loss or mitigate climate change. We argue that success can be achieved by aligning targets for biodiversity protection with the habitat protection and restoration necessary to bring down greenhouse gas concentrations and promote natural and societal adaptation to climate change. Success, however, will need much higher targets for environmental protection than the present 10% of sea and 17% of land. A new target of 30% of the sea given high levels of protection from exploitation and harm by 2030 is under consideration and similar targets are being discussed for terrestrial habitats. We make the case here that these higher targets, if achieved, would make the transition to a warmer world slower and less damaging for nature and people.

Bibliographical note

© 2020 The Author(s). This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.

    Research areas

  • Biodiversity conservation, Natural climate solutions, Nature-based solutions

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations