Closed judgments:security, accountability and court processes

Lawrence Joseph McNamara

Closed judgments:security, accountability and court processes

York Law School

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

A new practice direction reveals some valuable progress in the management of closed judgments, but leaves uncertainty and, very worryingly, indicates that some judgments will be destroyed. This post examines some of the most significant shortcomings and implications that arise, and proposes ways to address the problems.

Original language	English
Media of output	Blog post
Publisher	UK Human Rights Blog
Place of Publication	London
Publication status	Published - 25 Jan 2019

Keywords

Terrorism
Secrecy
national security

Access to Document

https://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2019/01/25/closed-judgments-security-accountability-and-court-processes/

Cite this

@misc{7fa432e926ca4f1c8d98dc63cb953566,

title = "Closed judgments:security, accountability and court processes",

abstract = "A new practice direction reveals some valuable progress in the management of closed judgments, but leaves uncertainty and, very worryingly, indicates that some judgments will be destroyed. This post examines some of the most significant shortcomings and implications that arise, and proposes ways to address the problems.",

keywords = "Terrorism, Secrecy, national security",

author = "McNamara, {Lawrence Joseph}",

year = "2019",

month = jan,

day = "25",

language = "English",

publisher = "UK Human Rights Blog",

type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Closed judgments:security, accountability and court processes

AU - McNamara, Lawrence Joseph

PY - 2019/1/25

Y1 - 2019/1/25

N2 - A new practice direction reveals some valuable progress in the management of closed judgments, but leaves uncertainty and, very worryingly, indicates that some judgments will be destroyed. This post examines some of the most significant shortcomings and implications that arise, and proposes ways to address the problems.

AB - A new practice direction reveals some valuable progress in the management of closed judgments, but leaves uncertainty and, very worryingly, indicates that some judgments will be destroyed. This post examines some of the most significant shortcomings and implications that arise, and proposes ways to address the problems.

KW - Terrorism

KW - Secrecy

KW - national security

M3 - Other contribution

PB - UK Human Rights Blog

CY - London

ER -