Cognitive behavioural therapies versus treatment as usual for depression

Vivien Hunot; Theresa H.M. Moore; Deborah M. Caldwell; Philippa Davies; Hannah F. Jones; Toshi A. Furukawa; Glyn Lewis; Rachel Churchill

doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008699.pub2

Cognitive behavioural therapies versus treatment as usual for depression

Vivien Hunot, Theresa H.M. Moore, Deborah M. Caldwell, Philippa Davies, Hannah F. Jones, Toshi A. Furukawa, Glyn Lewis, Rachel Churchill^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To examine the effectiveness and acceptability of all cognitive behavioural therapies compared with treatment as usual/waiting list/attention placebo control conditions for acute depression. To examine the effectiveness and acceptability of different cognitive behavioural therapy models (cognitive therapy, rational emotive behaviour therapy, problem-solving therapy, self-control therapy and the Coping with Depression course) compared with treatment as usual/waiting list/attention placebo control conditions for acute depression. To examine the effectiveness and acceptability of all cognitive behavioural therapies compared with different types of comparator (standard care, no treatment, waiting list, attention placebo) for acute depression.

Original language	English
Article number	CD008699
Journal	Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Volume	2018
Issue number	10
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008699.pub2
Publication status	Published - 22 Oct 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration.

Access to Document

10.1002/14651858.CD008699.pub2

Cite this

@article{2cfe1025787d47d79dfacff372405a51,

title = "Cognitive behavioural therapies versus treatment as usual for depression",

abstract = "This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To examine the effectiveness and acceptability of all cognitive behavioural therapies compared with treatment as usual/waiting list/attention placebo control conditions for acute depression. To examine the effectiveness and acceptability of different cognitive behavioural therapy models (cognitive therapy, rational emotive behaviour therapy, problem-solving therapy, self-control therapy and the Coping with Depression course) compared with treatment as usual/waiting list/attention placebo control conditions for acute depression. To examine the effectiveness and acceptability of all cognitive behavioural therapies compared with different types of comparator (standard care, no treatment, waiting list, attention placebo) for acute depression.",

author = "Vivien Hunot and Moore, {Theresa H.M.} and Caldwell, {Deborah M.} and Philippa Davies and Jones, {Hannah F.} and Furukawa, {Toshi A.} and Glyn Lewis and Rachel Churchill",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration.",

year = "2018",

month = oct,

day = "22",

doi = "10.1002/14651858.CD008699.pub2",

language = "English",

volume = "2018",

journal = "Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews",

issn = "1469-493X",

publisher = "The Cochrane Collaboration",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognitive behavioural therapies versus treatment as usual for depression

AU - Hunot, Vivien

AU - Moore, Theresa H.M.

AU - Caldwell, Deborah M.

AU - Davies, Philippa

AU - Jones, Hannah F.

AU - Furukawa, Toshi A.

AU - Lewis, Glyn

AU - Churchill, Rachel

PY - 2018/10/22

Y1 - 2018/10/22

N2 - This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To examine the effectiveness and acceptability of all cognitive behavioural therapies compared with treatment as usual/waiting list/attention placebo control conditions for acute depression. To examine the effectiveness and acceptability of different cognitive behavioural therapy models (cognitive therapy, rational emotive behaviour therapy, problem-solving therapy, self-control therapy and the Coping with Depression course) compared with treatment as usual/waiting list/attention placebo control conditions for acute depression. To examine the effectiveness and acceptability of all cognitive behavioural therapies compared with different types of comparator (standard care, no treatment, waiting list, attention placebo) for acute depression.

AB - This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To examine the effectiveness and acceptability of all cognitive behavioural therapies compared with treatment as usual/waiting list/attention placebo control conditions for acute depression. To examine the effectiveness and acceptability of different cognitive behavioural therapy models (cognitive therapy, rational emotive behaviour therapy, problem-solving therapy, self-control therapy and the Coping with Depression course) compared with treatment as usual/waiting list/attention placebo control conditions for acute depression. To examine the effectiveness and acceptability of all cognitive behavioural therapies compared with different types of comparator (standard care, no treatment, waiting list, attention placebo) for acute depression.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041798442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/14651858.CD008699.pub2

DO - 10.1002/14651858.CD008699.pub2

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85041798442

SN - 1469-493X

VL - 2018

JO - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

JF - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

IS - 10

M1 - CD008699

ER -

Cognitive behavioural therapies versus treatment as usual for depression

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this