Comment on "Experimental Test of Error-Disturbance Uncertainty Relations by Weak Measurement"

Research output: Working paper

Standard

Comment on "Experimental Test of Error-Disturbance Uncertainty Relations by Weak Measurement". / Busch, Paul; Lahti, Pekka; Werner, Reinhard F.

2014.

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Busch, P, Lahti, P & Werner, RF 2014 'Comment on "Experimental Test of Error-Disturbance Uncertainty Relations by Weak Measurement"'. <http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.0367>

APA

Busch, P., Lahti, P., & Werner, R. F. (2014). Comment on "Experimental Test of Error-Disturbance Uncertainty Relations by Weak Measurement". http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.0367

Vancouver

Busch P, Lahti P, Werner RF. Comment on "Experimental Test of Error-Disturbance Uncertainty Relations by Weak Measurement". 2014 Mar.

Author

Busch, Paul ; Lahti, Pekka ; Werner, Reinhard F. / Comment on "Experimental Test of Error-Disturbance Uncertainty Relations by Weak Measurement". 2014.

Bibtex - Download

@techreport{75cd2a0f78034891bf2cf6b0d57c32ee,
title = "Comment on {"}Experimental Test of Error-Disturbance Uncertainty Relations by Weak Measurement{"}",
abstract = "In this comment on the paper by F. Kaneda, S.-Y. Baek, M. Ozawa and K. Edamatsu [Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 020402, 2014, arXiv:1308.5868], we point out that the claim of having refuted Heisenberg's error-disturbance relation is unfounded since it is based on the choice of unsuitable and operationally problematical quantifications of measurement error and disturbance. As we have shown elsewhere [PRL 111, 160405, 2013], for appropriate choices of operational measures of error and disturbance, Heisenberg's heuristic relation can be turned into a precise inequality which is a rigorous consequence of quantum mechanics.",
author = "Paul Busch and Pekka Lahti and Werner, {Reinhard F}",
year = "2014",
month = mar,
language = "English",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - UNPB

T1 - Comment on "Experimental Test of Error-Disturbance Uncertainty Relations by Weak Measurement"

AU - Busch, Paul

AU - Lahti, Pekka

AU - Werner, Reinhard F

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - In this comment on the paper by F. Kaneda, S.-Y. Baek, M. Ozawa and K. Edamatsu [Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 020402, 2014, arXiv:1308.5868], we point out that the claim of having refuted Heisenberg's error-disturbance relation is unfounded since it is based on the choice of unsuitable and operationally problematical quantifications of measurement error and disturbance. As we have shown elsewhere [PRL 111, 160405, 2013], for appropriate choices of operational measures of error and disturbance, Heisenberg's heuristic relation can be turned into a precise inequality which is a rigorous consequence of quantum mechanics.

AB - In this comment on the paper by F. Kaneda, S.-Y. Baek, M. Ozawa and K. Edamatsu [Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 020402, 2014, arXiv:1308.5868], we point out that the claim of having refuted Heisenberg's error-disturbance relation is unfounded since it is based on the choice of unsuitable and operationally problematical quantifications of measurement error and disturbance. As we have shown elsewhere [PRL 111, 160405, 2013], for appropriate choices of operational measures of error and disturbance, Heisenberg's heuristic relation can be turned into a precise inequality which is a rigorous consequence of quantum mechanics.

M3 - Working paper

BT - Comment on "Experimental Test of Error-Disturbance Uncertainty Relations by Weak Measurement"

ER -