By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Comparing costs and outcomes across programmes of health care

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalHealth Economics
DateE-pub ahead of print - 14 Feb 2011
DatePublished (current) - Mar 2012
Issue number3
Volume21
Number of pages22
Pages (from-to)316-337
Early online date14/02/11
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

This paper examines the expenditure choices of local health authorities operating under fixed budget constraints. It applies a theoretical model of budgeting to a data set from 303 English Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) across ten broad programmes of health care to derive estimates of the elasticity of expenditure in each programme with respect to the total income of the PCT. The results suggest quite similar income elasticities across most programmes, in the range 0.644–1.128. The only outlier is the musculoskeletal programme with an elasticity of about 0.46. The modelling also derives estimates of spending elasticities with respect to medical needs and thereby permits calculation of the implicit cost of saving a life year in five programmes of care. The results are important as they indicate to policy makers how specific programme areas might be affected by general budgetary reductions.

    Research areas

  • Allocative efficiency, Budget elasticities, Health outcomes, Local health authorities, Programme budgets

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations