Comparing smoking cessation to screening and brief intervention for alcohol in distributional cost effectiveness analysis to explore the sensitivity of results to socioeconomic inequalities characterised in model inputs.

Fan Yang; Colin Angus; Ana Isabel Duarte; Duncan  Gillespie; Mark Sculpher; Simon Mark Walker; Susan Griffin

Comparing smoking cessation to screening and brief intervention for alcohol in distributional cost effectiveness analysis to explore the sensitivity of results to socioeconomic inequalities characterised in model inputs.

Fan Yang, Colin Angus, Ana Isabel Duarte, Duncan Gillespie, Mark Sculpher, Simon Mark Walker, Susan Griffin

Centre for Health Economics

Research output: Working paper › Discussion paper

Abstract

A distribution of intervention impact across socioeconomic groups can be estimated from
socioeconomic differences across a staircase from need (e.g. prevalence) up to intervention
characteristics (e.g. effectiveness) using distributional cost effectiveness analysis (DCEA). The extent
to which evidence on inequality at different steps of the staircase contributes to uncertainty in
population level impact is not well understood. We used DCEAs in smoking cessation and alcohol
interventions to explore how socioeconomic inequality in model inputs impacts upon final
conclusions about health inequality and value for money.

Original language	English
Place of Publication	York, UK
Publisher	Centre for Health Economics, University of York
Number of pages	82
Publication status	Published - Sept 2021

Publication series

Name	CHE Research Paper
Publisher	Centre for Health Economics, University of York
No.	184

Access to Document

CHERP184_smoking_cessation_screening_interventionFinal published version, 2.94 MB

https://www.york.ac.uk/media/che/documents/papers/researchpapers/CHERP184_smoking_cessation_screening_intervention.pdf

NIHR PRP PRU: LSHTM Public Health PRU 2019-24
Graham, H., Sculpher, M. & Sowden, A. J.
1/04/19 → 30/09/24
Project: Research project (funded) › Research

Cite this

Yang, F., Angus, C., Duarte, A. I., Gillespie, D., Sculpher, M., Walker, S. M., & Griffin, S. (2021). Comparing smoking cessation to screening and brief intervention for alcohol in distributional cost effectiveness analysis to explore the sensitivity of results to socioeconomic inequalities characterised in model inputs. (CHE Research Paper; No. 184). Centre for Health Economics, University of York. https://www.york.ac.uk/media/che/documents/papers/researchpapers/CHERP184_smoking_cessation_screening_intervention.pdf

@techreport{6c69581615034649b8936d7149e1e558,

title = "Comparing smoking cessation to screening and brief intervention for alcohol in distributional cost effectiveness analysis to explore the sensitivity of results to socioeconomic inequalities characterised in model inputs.",

abstract = "A distribution of intervention impact across socioeconomic groups can be estimated fromsocioeconomic differences across a staircase from need (e.g. prevalence) up to interventioncharacteristics (e.g. effectiveness) using distributional cost effectiveness analysis (DCEA). The extentto which evidence on inequality at different steps of the staircase contributes to uncertainty inpopulation level impact is not well understood. We used DCEAs in smoking cessation and alcoholinterventions to explore how socioeconomic inequality in model inputs impacts upon finalconclusions about health inequality and value for money.",

author = "Fan Yang and Colin Angus and Duarte, {Ana Isabel} and Duncan Gillespie and Mark Sculpher and Walker, {Simon Mark} and Susan Griffin",

year = "2021",

month = sep,

language = "English",

series = "CHE Research Paper",

publisher = "Centre for Health Economics, University of York",

number = "184",

type = "WorkingPaper",

institution = "Centre for Health Economics, University of York",

}

Yang, F, Angus, C, Duarte, AI, Gillespie, D, Sculpher, M , Walker, SM & Griffin, S 2021 'Comparing smoking cessation to screening and brief intervention for alcohol in distributional cost effectiveness analysis to explore the sensitivity of results to socioeconomic inequalities characterised in model inputs.' CHE Research Paper, no. 184, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK. <https://www.york.ac.uk/media/che/documents/papers/researchpapers/CHERP184_smoking_cessation_screening_intervention.pdf>

Comparing smoking cessation to screening and brief intervention for alcohol in distributional cost effectiveness analysis to explore the sensitivity of results to socioeconomic inequalities characterised in model inputs. / Yang, Fan; Angus, Colin; Duarte, Ana Isabel et al.
York, UK: Centre for Health Economics, University of York, 2021. (CHE Research Paper; No. 184).

Research output: Working paper › Discussion paper

TY - UNPB

T1 - Comparing smoking cessation to screening and brief intervention for alcohol in distributional cost effectiveness analysis to explore the sensitivity of results to socioeconomic inequalities characterised in model inputs.

AU - Yang, Fan

AU - Angus, Colin

AU - Duarte, Ana Isabel

AU - Gillespie, Duncan

AU - Sculpher, Mark

AU - Walker, Simon Mark

AU - Griffin, Susan

PY - 2021/9

Y1 - 2021/9

N2 - A distribution of intervention impact across socioeconomic groups can be estimated fromsocioeconomic differences across a staircase from need (e.g. prevalence) up to interventioncharacteristics (e.g. effectiveness) using distributional cost effectiveness analysis (DCEA). The extentto which evidence on inequality at different steps of the staircase contributes to uncertainty inpopulation level impact is not well understood. We used DCEAs in smoking cessation and alcoholinterventions to explore how socioeconomic inequality in model inputs impacts upon finalconclusions about health inequality and value for money.

AB - A distribution of intervention impact across socioeconomic groups can be estimated fromsocioeconomic differences across a staircase from need (e.g. prevalence) up to interventioncharacteristics (e.g. effectiveness) using distributional cost effectiveness analysis (DCEA). The extentto which evidence on inequality at different steps of the staircase contributes to uncertainty inpopulation level impact is not well understood. We used DCEAs in smoking cessation and alcoholinterventions to explore how socioeconomic inequality in model inputs impacts upon finalconclusions about health inequality and value for money.

M3 - Discussion paper

T3 - CHE Research Paper

BT - Comparing smoking cessation to screening and brief intervention for alcohol in distributional cost effectiveness analysis to explore the sensitivity of results to socioeconomic inequalities characterised in model inputs.

PB - Centre for Health Economics, University of York

CY - York, UK

ER -

Yang F, Angus C, Duarte AI, Gillespie D, Sculpher M , Walker SM et al. Comparing smoking cessation to screening and brief intervention for alcohol in distributional cost effectiveness analysis to explore the sensitivity of results to socioeconomic inequalities characterised in model inputs. York, UK: Centre for Health Economics, University of York. 2021 Sept. (CHE Research Paper; 184).

Comparing smoking cessation to screening and brief intervention for alcohol in distributional cost effectiveness analysis to explore the sensitivity of results to socioeconomic inequalities characterised in model inputs.

Abstract

Publication series

Access to Document

Projects

NIHR PRP PRU: LSHTM Public Health PRU 2019-24

Cite this