Comparison of Major Depression Diagnostic Classification Probability using the SCID, CIDI and MINI Diagnostic Interviews among Women in Pregnancy or Postpartum: An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis

Brooke Levis; Dean McMillan; Ying Sun; Chen  He; Danielle B Rice; Ankur  Krishnan; Yin Wu; Marleine Azar; Tatiana A Sanchez; Matthew J Chiovitti; Parash Mani  Bhandari; Dipika  Neupane; Nazanin Saadat; Kira E Riehm; Mahrukh  Imran; Jill T.  Boruff; Pim Cuijpers; Simon Gilbody; John P A Ioannidis; Lorie A Kloda; Scott B Patten; Ian Shrier; Roy C Ziegelstein; Liane Comeau; Nicholas Mitchell; Marcello Tonelli; Simone N.  Vigod; Franca  Aceti; Rubén  Alvarado; Cosme  Alvarado-Esquivel; Muideen O.  Bakare; Jacqueline  Barnes; Cheryl  Tatano Beck; Carola  Bindt; Philip M.  Boyce; Adomas Bunevicius; Tiago  Castro e Couto; Linda H.  Chaudron; Humberto  Correa; Felipe  Pinheiro de Figueiredo; Valsamma  Eapen; Michelle Fernandes .; Bárbara F. C. Figueiredo .; Jane R. W.  .Fisher; Lluïsa Garcia-Esteve .; Lisa Giardinelli .; Nadine Helle .; Louise M. Howard .; Dina Sami Khalifa .; Laima Kusminskas .; Jane Kohlhoff .; Zoltán Kozinszky .; Lorenzo  Lelli; Angeliki A.  Leonardou; Beth A.  Lewis; Michael  Maes; Valentina  Meuti; Sandra  Nakić Radoš; Purificación  Navarro García; Daisuke  Nishi; Daniel  Okitundu Luwa E-Andjafono; Emma  Robertson-Blackmore; Tamsen J.  Rochat; Heather J.  Rowe; Bonnie W. M.  Siu; Alkistis  Skalkidou; Alan Stein; Robert C.  Stewart; Kuan-Pin  Su; Inger  Sundström-Poromaa; Meri  Tadinac; s Darius Tandon; Iva  Tendais; Pavaani  Thiagayson; Annamária  Töreki; Anna  Torres-Giménez; Thach D.  Tran; Kylee  Trevillion; Katherine  Turner; Johann M.  Vega-Dienstmaier; Karen  Wynter; Kimberly A.  Yonkers; Andrea Benedetti; Brett D Thombs

Comparison of Major Depression Diagnostic Classification Probability using the SCID, CIDI and MINI Diagnostic Interviews among Women in Pregnancy or Postpartum: An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis

Brooke Levis, Dean McMillan, Ying Sun, Chen He, Danielle B Rice, Ankur Krishnan, Yin Wu, Marleine Azar, Tatiana A Sanchez, Matthew J Chiovitti, Parash Mani Bhandari, Dipika Neupane, Nazanin Saadat, Kira E Riehm, Mahrukh Imran, Jill T. Boruff, Pim Cuijpers, Simon Gilbody, John P A Ioannidis, Lorie A KlodaScott B Patten, Ian Shrier, Roy C Ziegelstein, Liane Comeau, Nicholas Mitchell, Marcello Tonelli, Simone N. Vigod, Franca Aceti, Rubén Alvarado, Cosme Alvarado-Esquivel, Muideen O. Bakare, Jacqueline Barnes, Cheryl Tatano Beck, Carola Bindt, Philip M. Boyce, Adomas Bunevicius, Tiago Castro e Couto, Linda H. Chaudron, Humberto Correa, Felipe Pinheiro de Figueiredo, Valsamma Eapen, Michelle Fernandes ., Bárbara F. C. Figueiredo ., Jane R. W. .Fisher, Lluïsa Garcia-Esteve ., Lisa Giardinelli ., Nadine Helle ., Louise M. Howard ., Dina Sami Khalifa ., Laima Kusminskas ., Jane Kohlhoff ., Zoltán Kozinszky ., Lorenzo Lelli, Angeliki A. Leonardou, Beth A. Lewis, Michael Maes, Valentina Meuti, Sandra Nakić Radoš, Purificación Navarro García, Daisuke Nishi, Daniel Okitundu Luwa E-Andjafono, Emma Robertson-Blackmore, Tamsen J. Rochat, Heather J. Rowe, Bonnie W. M. Siu, Alkistis Skalkidou, Alan Stein, Robert C. Stewart, Kuan-Pin Su, Inger Sundström-Poromaa, Meri Tadinac, s Darius Tandon, Iva Tendais, Pavaani Thiagayson, Annamária Töreki, Anna Torres-Giménez, Thach D. Tran, Kylee Trevillion, Katherine Turner, Johann M. Vega-Dienstmaier, Karen Wynter, Kimberly A. Yonkers, Andrea Benedetti, Brett D Thombs

The Hull York Medical School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A previous individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) identified differences in major depression classification rates between different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on the basis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. We aimed to determine whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum.

METHODS: Data accrued for an EPDS diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant characteristics.

RESULTS: Among fully structured interviews, the MINI (15 studies, 2,532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2,948 participants, 194 major depression cases; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the semistructured SCID (28 studies, 7,403 participants, 1,027 major depression cases), odds with the CIDI (interaction aOR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.92, 0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased.

CONCLUSION: Different interviews may not classify major depression equivalently.

Original language	English
Number of pages	11
Journal	International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Early online date	30 Sept 2019
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 30 Sept 2019

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Levis_et_al-2019-International_Journal_of_Methods_in_Psychiatric_Research
© 2019 The Authors.
Final published version, 392 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

Levis, B., McMillan, D., Sun, Y., He, C., Rice, D. B., Krishnan, A., Wu, Y., Azar, M., Sanchez, T. A., Chiovitti, M. J., Bhandari, P. M., Neupane, D., Saadat, N., Riehm, K. E., Imran, M., Boruff, J. T., Cuijpers, P., Gilbody, S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., ... Thombs, B. D. (2019). Comparison of Major Depression Diagnostic Classification Probability using the SCID, CIDI and MINI Diagnostic Interviews among Women in Pregnancy or Postpartum: An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. Advance online publication.

@article{05e92b47b8c14676afc03f38b2a2cec8,

title = "Comparison of Major Depression Diagnostic Classification Probability using the SCID, CIDI and MINI Diagnostic Interviews among Women in Pregnancy or Postpartum: An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis",

abstract = "OBJECTIVES: A previous individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) identified differences in major depression classification rates between different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on the basis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. We aimed to determine whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum.METHODS: Data accrued for an EPDS diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant characteristics.RESULTS: Among fully structured interviews, the MINI (15 studies, 2,532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2,948 participants, 194 major depression cases; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the semistructured SCID (28 studies, 7,403 participants, 1,027 major depression cases), odds with the CIDI (interaction aOR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.92, 0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased.CONCLUSION: Different interviews may not classify major depression equivalently.",

author = "Brooke Levis and Dean McMillan and Ying Sun and Chen He and Rice, {Danielle B} and Ankur Krishnan and Yin Wu and Marleine Azar and Sanchez, {Tatiana A} and Chiovitti, {Matthew J} and Bhandari, {Parash Mani} and Dipika Neupane and Nazanin Saadat and Riehm, {Kira E} and Mahrukh Imran and Boruff, {Jill T.} and Pim Cuijpers and Simon Gilbody and Ioannidis, {John P A} and Kloda, {Lorie A} and Patten, {Scott B} and Ian Shrier and Ziegelstein, {Roy C} and Liane Comeau and Nicholas Mitchell and Marcello Tonelli and Vigod, {Simone N.} and Franca Aceti and Rub{\'e}n Alvarado and Cosme Alvarado-Esquivel and Bakare, {Muideen O.} and Jacqueline Barnes and {Tatano Beck}, Cheryl and Carola Bindt and Boyce, {Philip M.} and Adomas Bunevicius and {Castro e Couto}, Tiago and Chaudron, {Linda H.} and Humberto Correa and {Pinheiro de Figueiredo}, Felipe and Valsamma Eapen and ., {Michelle Fernandes} and ., {B{\'a}rbara F. C. Figueiredo} and .Fisher, {Jane R. W.} and ., {Llu{\"i}sa Garcia-Esteve} and ., {Lisa Giardinelli} and ., {Nadine Helle} and ., {Louise M. Howard} and ., {Dina Sami Khalifa} and ., {Laima Kusminskas} and ., {Jane Kohlhoff} and ., {Zolt{\'a}n Kozinszky} and Lorenzo Lelli and Leonardou, {Angeliki A.} and Lewis, {Beth A.} and Michael Maes and Valentina Meuti and {Naki{\'c} Rado{\v s}}, Sandra and {Navarro Garc{\'i}a}, Purificaci{\'o}n and Daisuke Nishi and {Okitundu Luwa E-Andjafono}, Daniel and Emma Robertson-Blackmore and Rochat, {Tamsen J.} and Rowe, {Heather J.} and Siu, {Bonnie W. M.} and Alkistis Skalkidou and Alan Stein and Stewart, {Robert C.} and Kuan-Pin Su and Inger Sundstr{\"o}m-Poromaa and Meri Tadinac and {Darius Tandon}, s and Iva Tendais and Pavaani Thiagayson and Annam{\'a}ria T{\"o}reki and Anna Torres-Gim{\'e}nez and Tran, {Thach D.} and Kylee Trevillion and Katherine Turner and Vega-Dienstmaier, {Johann M.} and Karen Wynter and Yonkers, {Kimberly A.} and Andrea Benedetti and Thombs, {Brett D}",

note = "{\textcopyright} 2019 The Authors.",

year = "2019",

month = sep,

day = "30",

language = "English",

journal = "International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research",

issn = "1049-8931",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

Levis, B, McMillan, D, Sun, Y, He, C, Rice, DB, Krishnan, A, Wu, Y, Azar, M, Sanchez, TA, Chiovitti, MJ, Bhandari, PM, Neupane, D, Saadat, N, Riehm, KE, Imran, M, Boruff, JT, Cuijpers, P, Gilbody, S, Ioannidis, JPA, Kloda, LA, Patten, SB, Shrier, I, Ziegelstein, RC, Comeau, L, Mitchell, N, Tonelli, M, Vigod, SN, Aceti, F, Alvarado, R, Alvarado-Esquivel, C, Bakare, MO, Barnes, J, Tatano Beck, C, Bindt, C, Boyce, PM, Bunevicius, A, Castro e Couto, T, Chaudron, LH, Correa, H, Pinheiro de Figueiredo, F, Eapen, V, ., MF, ., BFCF, .Fisher, JRW, ., LG-E, ., LG, ., NH, ., LMH, ., DSK, ., LK, ., JK, ., ZK, Lelli, L, Leonardou, AA, Lewis, BA, Maes, M, Meuti, V, Nakić Radoš, S, Navarro García, P, Nishi, D, Okitundu Luwa E-Andjafono, D, Robertson-Blackmore, E, Rochat, TJ, Rowe, HJ, Siu, BWM, Skalkidou, A, Stein, A, Stewart, RC, Su, K-P, Sundström-Poromaa, I, Tadinac, M, Darius Tandon, S, Tendais, I, Thiagayson, P, Töreki, A, Torres-Giménez, A, Tran, TD, Trevillion, K, Turner, K, Vega-Dienstmaier, JM, Wynter, K, Yonkers, KA, Benedetti, A & Thombs, BD 2019, 'Comparison of Major Depression Diagnostic Classification Probability using the SCID, CIDI and MINI Diagnostic Interviews among Women in Pregnancy or Postpartum: An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis', International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research.

Comparison of Major Depression Diagnostic Classification Probability using the SCID, CIDI and MINI Diagnostic Interviews among Women in Pregnancy or Postpartum: An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis. / Levis, Brooke; McMillan, Dean; Sun, Ying et al.
In: International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 30.09.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Major Depression Diagnostic Classification Probability using the SCID, CIDI and MINI Diagnostic Interviews among Women in Pregnancy or Postpartum

T2 - An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis

AU - Levis, Brooke

AU - McMillan, Dean

AU - Sun, Ying

AU - He, Chen

AU - Rice, Danielle B

AU - Krishnan, Ankur

AU - Wu, Yin

AU - Azar, Marleine

AU - Sanchez, Tatiana A

AU - Chiovitti, Matthew J

AU - Bhandari, Parash Mani

AU - Neupane, Dipika

AU - Saadat, Nazanin

AU - Riehm, Kira E

AU - Imran, Mahrukh

AU - Boruff, Jill T.

AU - Cuijpers, Pim

AU - Gilbody, Simon

AU - Ioannidis, John P A

AU - Kloda, Lorie A

AU - Patten, Scott B

AU - Shrier, Ian

AU - Ziegelstein, Roy C

AU - Comeau, Liane

AU - Mitchell, Nicholas

AU - Tonelli, Marcello

AU - Vigod, Simone N.

AU - Aceti, Franca

AU - Alvarado, Rubén

AU - Alvarado-Esquivel, Cosme

AU - Bakare, Muideen O.

AU - Barnes, Jacqueline

AU - Tatano Beck, Cheryl

AU - Bindt, Carola

AU - Boyce, Philip M.

AU - Bunevicius, Adomas

AU - Castro e Couto, Tiago

AU - Chaudron, Linda H.

AU - Correa, Humberto

AU - Pinheiro de Figueiredo, Felipe

AU - Eapen, Valsamma

AU - ., Michelle Fernandes

AU - ., Bárbara F. C. Figueiredo

AU - .Fisher, Jane R. W.

AU - ., Lluïsa Garcia-Esteve

AU - ., Lisa Giardinelli

AU - ., Nadine Helle

AU - ., Louise M. Howard

AU - ., Dina Sami Khalifa

AU - ., Laima Kusminskas

AU - ., Jane Kohlhoff

AU - ., Zoltán Kozinszky

AU - Lelli, Lorenzo

AU - Leonardou, Angeliki A.

AU - Lewis, Beth A.

AU - Maes, Michael

AU - Meuti, Valentina

AU - Nakić Radoš, Sandra

AU - Navarro García, Purificación

AU - Nishi, Daisuke

AU - Okitundu Luwa E-Andjafono, Daniel

AU - Robertson-Blackmore, Emma

AU - Rochat, Tamsen J.

AU - Rowe, Heather J.

AU - Siu, Bonnie W. M.

AU - Skalkidou, Alkistis

AU - Stein, Alan

AU - Stewart, Robert C.

AU - Su, Kuan-Pin

AU - Sundström-Poromaa, Inger

AU - Tadinac, Meri

AU - Darius Tandon, s

AU - Tendais, Iva

AU - Thiagayson, Pavaani

AU - Töreki, Annamária

AU - Torres-Giménez, Anna

AU - Tran, Thach D.

AU - Trevillion, Kylee

AU - Turner, Katherine

AU - Vega-Dienstmaier, Johann M.

AU - Wynter, Karen

AU - Yonkers, Kimberly A.

AU - Benedetti, Andrea

AU - Thombs, Brett D

PY - 2019/9/30

Y1 - 2019/9/30

N2 - OBJECTIVES: A previous individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) identified differences in major depression classification rates between different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on the basis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. We aimed to determine whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum.METHODS: Data accrued for an EPDS diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant characteristics.RESULTS: Among fully structured interviews, the MINI (15 studies, 2,532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2,948 participants, 194 major depression cases; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the semistructured SCID (28 studies, 7,403 participants, 1,027 major depression cases), odds with the CIDI (interaction aOR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.92, 0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased.CONCLUSION: Different interviews may not classify major depression equivalently.

AB - OBJECTIVES: A previous individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) identified differences in major depression classification rates between different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on the basis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. We aimed to determine whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum.METHODS: Data accrued for an EPDS diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant characteristics.RESULTS: Among fully structured interviews, the MINI (15 studies, 2,532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2,948 participants, 194 major depression cases; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the semistructured SCID (28 studies, 7,403 participants, 1,027 major depression cases), odds with the CIDI (interaction aOR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.92, 0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased.CONCLUSION: Different interviews may not classify major depression equivalently.

M3 - Article

SN - 1049-8931

JO - International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

JF - International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

ER -