By the same authors

From the same journal

Comparison of pesticide leaching models: results using the Weiherbach data set

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Comparison of pesticide leaching models : results using the Weiherbach data set. / Gottesburen, B ; Aden, K ; Barlund, I ; Brown, C ; Dust, M ; Gorlitz, G ; Jarvis, N ; Rekolainen, S ; Schafer, H ; Brown, Colin David.

In: Agricultural water management, Vol. 44, No. 1-3, 05.2000, p. 153-181.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Gottesburen, B, Aden, K, Barlund, I, Brown, C, Dust, M, Gorlitz, G, Jarvis, N, Rekolainen, S, Schafer, H & Brown, CD 2000, 'Comparison of pesticide leaching models: results using the Weiherbach data set', Agricultural water management, vol. 44, no. 1-3, pp. 153-181.

APA

Gottesburen, B., Aden, K., Barlund, I., Brown, C., Dust, M., Gorlitz, G., Jarvis, N., Rekolainen, S., Schafer, H., & Brown, C. D. (2000). Comparison of pesticide leaching models: results using the Weiherbach data set. Agricultural water management, 44(1-3), 153-181.

Vancouver

Gottesburen B, Aden K, Barlund I, Brown C, Dust M, Gorlitz G et al. Comparison of pesticide leaching models: results using the Weiherbach data set. Agricultural water management. 2000 May;44(1-3):153-181.

Author

Gottesburen, B ; Aden, K ; Barlund, I ; Brown, C ; Dust, M ; Gorlitz, G ; Jarvis, N ; Rekolainen, S ; Schafer, H ; Brown, Colin David. / Comparison of pesticide leaching models : results using the Weiherbach data set. In: Agricultural water management. 2000 ; Vol. 44, No. 1-3. pp. 153-181.

Bibtex - Download

@article{bf949933d83d432dbd9b65cb6a34de50,
title = "Comparison of pesticide leaching models: results using the Weiherbach data set",
abstract = "The leaching of the herbicide isoproturon and the water tracer bromide in the profile of a silty loam soil at the Weiherbach Catchment area in Germany was simulated by eight different persons using the models MACRO, SIMULAT, LEACHP, WAVE, GLEAMS and PELMO (only bromide). Experimental results from different laboratory studies and from a field study were available to parameterise the models. Model results concerning water contents, tracer and pesticide profiles were provided for two different test periods in the field (winter and spring). The results for the behaviour of the herbicide and the tracer in the field study in spring were not known beforehand to the model users. Therefore this is considered to be a blind test.After the model users had estimated the parameters and presented the modelling results a consensus parameter set was provided by the data set co-ordinator to reduce the subjective influence of individual users and to identify the effect of different model concepts.The most striking points of the modelling exercise were the diversity of parameters estimated by different modellers from the same basic data set and the problems of simulating the field behaviour using laboratory derived pesticide parameters.An overwhelming influence of the individual users on the model results was remarkable for the Weiherbach data set. It was not possible to estimate, from the laboratory data, alone a parameter combination suitable for describing the field behaviour of isoproturon satisfactorily. The use of Literature data or calibration to the field results of the winter period did improve the simulation results significantly. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "simulation models, herbicide, tracer, leaching, calibration, validation, soil",
author = "B Gottesburen and K Aden and I Barlund and C Brown and M Dust and G Gorlitz and N Jarvis and S Rekolainen and H Schafer and Brown, {Colin David}",
year = "2000",
month = may,
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "153--181",
journal = "Agricultural water management",
issn = "0378-3774",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-3",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of pesticide leaching models

T2 - results using the Weiherbach data set

AU - Gottesburen, B

AU - Aden, K

AU - Barlund, I

AU - Brown, C

AU - Dust, M

AU - Gorlitz, G

AU - Jarvis, N

AU - Rekolainen, S

AU - Schafer, H

AU - Brown, Colin David

PY - 2000/5

Y1 - 2000/5

N2 - The leaching of the herbicide isoproturon and the water tracer bromide in the profile of a silty loam soil at the Weiherbach Catchment area in Germany was simulated by eight different persons using the models MACRO, SIMULAT, LEACHP, WAVE, GLEAMS and PELMO (only bromide). Experimental results from different laboratory studies and from a field study were available to parameterise the models. Model results concerning water contents, tracer and pesticide profiles were provided for two different test periods in the field (winter and spring). The results for the behaviour of the herbicide and the tracer in the field study in spring were not known beforehand to the model users. Therefore this is considered to be a blind test.After the model users had estimated the parameters and presented the modelling results a consensus parameter set was provided by the data set co-ordinator to reduce the subjective influence of individual users and to identify the effect of different model concepts.The most striking points of the modelling exercise were the diversity of parameters estimated by different modellers from the same basic data set and the problems of simulating the field behaviour using laboratory derived pesticide parameters.An overwhelming influence of the individual users on the model results was remarkable for the Weiherbach data set. It was not possible to estimate, from the laboratory data, alone a parameter combination suitable for describing the field behaviour of isoproturon satisfactorily. The use of Literature data or calibration to the field results of the winter period did improve the simulation results significantly. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

AB - The leaching of the herbicide isoproturon and the water tracer bromide in the profile of a silty loam soil at the Weiherbach Catchment area in Germany was simulated by eight different persons using the models MACRO, SIMULAT, LEACHP, WAVE, GLEAMS and PELMO (only bromide). Experimental results from different laboratory studies and from a field study were available to parameterise the models. Model results concerning water contents, tracer and pesticide profiles were provided for two different test periods in the field (winter and spring). The results for the behaviour of the herbicide and the tracer in the field study in spring were not known beforehand to the model users. Therefore this is considered to be a blind test.After the model users had estimated the parameters and presented the modelling results a consensus parameter set was provided by the data set co-ordinator to reduce the subjective influence of individual users and to identify the effect of different model concepts.The most striking points of the modelling exercise were the diversity of parameters estimated by different modellers from the same basic data set and the problems of simulating the field behaviour using laboratory derived pesticide parameters.An overwhelming influence of the individual users on the model results was remarkable for the Weiherbach data set. It was not possible to estimate, from the laboratory data, alone a parameter combination suitable for describing the field behaviour of isoproturon satisfactorily. The use of Literature data or calibration to the field results of the winter period did improve the simulation results significantly. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

KW - simulation models

KW - herbicide

KW - tracer

KW - leaching

KW - calibration

KW - validation

KW - soil

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 153

EP - 181

JO - Agricultural water management

JF - Agricultural water management

SN - 0378-3774

IS - 1-3

ER -