Abstract
Competition is often prescribed as an efficiency-enhancing tonic for ailing health systems. However, critics claim that competition exacerbates socioeconomic inequality in health care. This claim is tested in relation to the "internal market" reforms of the English National Health Service (NHS) from 1991 to 97, which injected a small dose of hospital competition into a state-funded, state-owned health system responsible for more than 90% of national health expenditure. Our dependent variables are NHS hospital utilization rates for hip replacement and heart revascularization in 8,500 English small areas from 1991 to 2001. We estimate small area level associations between deprivation and hospital utilization, allowing for need and supply variables. We then compare year-by-year inequality differences between areas with "potentially competitive" and "noncompetitive" local hospital markets, as competition was phased in and out. No evidence is found that competition had any effect on socioeconomic health care inequality.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | I181-I205 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | supplement 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2010 |
Bibliographical note
© The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Inc. All rights reserved.Keywords
- NHS INTERNAL MARKET
- CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION
- REGULATED COMPETITION
- SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS
- EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS
- JOINT REPLACEMENT
- CARE SERVICES
- WAITING-TIMES
- MEDICAL-CARE
- ACCESS