Concerns about the evidence in relation to implementation of the ProFHER trial

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Keywords

@article{479b489560704bc9897a976d49cff54a,

title = "Concerns about the evidence in relation to implementation of the ProFHER trial",

keywords = "Cost-Benefit Analysis, Orthopedic Procedures, Orthopedics",

author = "Helen Handoll and Stephen Brealey and Amar Rangan",

year = "2020",

month = feb,

day = "10",

doi = "10.1136/bmjqs-2020-010854",

language = "English",

volume = "29",

pages = "430--431",

journal = "BMJ Quality & Safety",

issn = "2044-5415",

publisher = "BMJ",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Concerns about the evidence in relation to implementation of the ProFHER trial

AU - Handoll, Helen

AU - Brealey, Stephen

AU - Rangan, Amar

PY - 2020/2/10

Y1 - 2020/2/10

KW - Cost-Benefit Analysis

KW - Orthopedic Procedures

KW - Orthopedics

U2 - 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-010854

DO - 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-010854

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 32041811

SN - 2044-5415

VL - 29

SP - 430

EP - 431

JO - BMJ Quality & Safety

JF - BMJ Quality & Safety

IS - 5

ER -