Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Journal | Child Development |
---|---|
Date | Published - 18 Mar 2011 |
Issue number | 2 |
Volume | 82 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Pages (from-to) | 646-60 |
Original language | English |
Abstract reasoning is critical for science and mathematics, but is very difficult. In 3 studies, the hypothesis that alternatives generation required for conditional reasoning with false premises facilitates abstract reasoning is examined. Study 1 (n = 372) found that reasoning with false premises improved abstract reasoning in 12- to 15-year-olds. Study 2 (n = 366) found a positive effect of simply generating alternatives, but only in 19-year-olds. Study 3 (n = 92) found that 9- to 11-year-olds were able to respond logically with false premises, whereas no such ability was observed in 6- to 7-year-olds. Reasoning with false premises was found to improve reasoning with semiabstract premises in the older children. These results support the idea that alternatives generation with false premises facilitates abstract reasoning.
Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.