Considering the team in team formulation: a systematic review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Considering the team in team formulation

T2 - a systematic review

AU - Short, Valentina

AU - Covey, Judith A.

AU - Webster, Lisa A.

AU - Wadman, Ruth

AU - Reilly, Joe

AU - Hay-Gibson, Naomi

AU - Stain, Helen J.

N1 - © Emerald Publishing Limited 2019. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.

PY - 2019/1/24

Y1 - 2019/1/24

N2 - Purpose: Team formulation, used to understand patient problems and plan care, is a growing practice in adult mental health and learning disability services. The purpose of this paper is to explore definitions applied to team formulation (as distinct to therapy formulation), its underpinning theories, and the inter-relationship between the team and the process of formulation. Design/methodology/approach: A database search (main search term of team formulation) of peer-reviewed studies was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. A main and second reviewer conducted quality appraisals and thematic analysis. Data were analysed by convergent qualitative synthesis design using thematic analysis to transform evidence from quantitative and qualitative studies into qualitative findings. Findings: Initial searching produced 4,532 papers, 10 of which were eligible for inclusion. Team formulation has no distinct definition. Theories underpinning the practice of therapy formulation emanating from general psychological theory underpin team formulation. Seven studies applied psychological theories to the examination of team formulation. No studies examined the impact of the team on the formulation. Six themes were generated regarding the impact of team formulation on the team; “increased knowledge and understanding”, “altered perceptions, leading to altered relationships, feelings and behaviours”, “space to reflect”, “useful when stuck or challenged”, “perceived increase in effectiveness” and “improved team working”. Research limitations/implications: Limited evidence and variable quality compromised the availability of review evidence. Originality/value: This is the first review to examine team formulation through the context of the team. The authors argue that a conceptual framework to encompass team inputs, processes and outputs in team formulation practice should guide future research.

AB - Purpose: Team formulation, used to understand patient problems and plan care, is a growing practice in adult mental health and learning disability services. The purpose of this paper is to explore definitions applied to team formulation (as distinct to therapy formulation), its underpinning theories, and the inter-relationship between the team and the process of formulation. Design/methodology/approach: A database search (main search term of team formulation) of peer-reviewed studies was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. A main and second reviewer conducted quality appraisals and thematic analysis. Data were analysed by convergent qualitative synthesis design using thematic analysis to transform evidence from quantitative and qualitative studies into qualitative findings. Findings: Initial searching produced 4,532 papers, 10 of which were eligible for inclusion. Team formulation has no distinct definition. Theories underpinning the practice of therapy formulation emanating from general psychological theory underpin team formulation. Seven studies applied psychological theories to the examination of team formulation. No studies examined the impact of the team on the formulation. Six themes were generated regarding the impact of team formulation on the team; “increased knowledge and understanding”, “altered perceptions, leading to altered relationships, feelings and behaviours”, “space to reflect”, “useful when stuck or challenged”, “perceived increase in effectiveness” and “improved team working”. Research limitations/implications: Limited evidence and variable quality compromised the availability of review evidence. Originality/value: This is the first review to examine team formulation through the context of the team. The authors argue that a conceptual framework to encompass team inputs, processes and outputs in team formulation practice should guide future research.

KW - Evidence-based team formulation

KW - Team context and team formulation

KW - Team formulation

KW - Team formulation definition

KW - Team formulation impact

KW - Team formulation theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060586292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/MHRJ-12-2017-0055

DO - 10.1108/MHRJ-12-2017-0055

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85060586292

SN - 1361-9322

VL - 24

SP - 11

EP - 29

JO - Mental Health Review Journal

JF - Mental Health Review Journal

IS - 1

ER -