Conspecific alarm calls, but not food-associated calls, elicit affect-based and object-based mental representations in a bonobo (Pan paniscus).

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conspecific alarm calls, but not food-associated calls, elicit affect-based and object-based mental representations in a bonobo (Pan paniscus).

AU - Lahiff, Nicole J

AU - Clay, Zanna

AU - Epping, Amanda J

AU - Taglialatela, Jared P

AU - Townsend, Simon W

AU - Slocombe, Katie E

N1 - © 2025 The Author(s).

PY - 2025/3/5

Y1 - 2025/3/5

N2 - Non-human vocalizations carrying information regarding external events have been likened to referential words and are thus integral for exploring the origins of linguistic reference. Previous research suggests receivers decode this referential information and some studies have indicated that such calls can, like in humans, evoke mental representations of the referent in receivers. However, the nature of these representations remains ambiguous. Specifically, whether calls elicit affect-based representations (e.g. signaller fear after alarm calls) or object-based representations (e.g. threats encountered by signallers after alarm calls), or both, in listeners remains untested. To investigate this, we conducted a match-to-sample task with a language-competent bonobo (Kanzi) asking him to match playbacks of conspecific alarm and food-associated calls to lexigrams representing either affect-based ('scare', 'surprise') or object-based ('snake', 'food') content. Kanzi matched alarm calls to 'scare' and 'snake' lexigrams at above chance levels regardless of caller familiarity but did not match food-associated calls to either 'surprise' or 'food' targets. We propose environmental cues are required to interpret food-associated calls that occur across a variety of contexts. These findings suggest bonobo alarm calls evoke object- and affect-based representations for Kanzi, indicating the mechanisms underlying the perception of non-human vocalizations may be more similar to those in language than previously thought.

AB - Non-human vocalizations carrying information regarding external events have been likened to referential words and are thus integral for exploring the origins of linguistic reference. Previous research suggests receivers decode this referential information and some studies have indicated that such calls can, like in humans, evoke mental representations of the referent in receivers. However, the nature of these representations remains ambiguous. Specifically, whether calls elicit affect-based representations (e.g. signaller fear after alarm calls) or object-based representations (e.g. threats encountered by signallers after alarm calls), or both, in listeners remains untested. To investigate this, we conducted a match-to-sample task with a language-competent bonobo (Kanzi) asking him to match playbacks of conspecific alarm and food-associated calls to lexigrams representing either affect-based ('scare', 'surprise') or object-based ('snake', 'food') content. Kanzi matched alarm calls to 'scare' and 'snake' lexigrams at above chance levels regardless of caller familiarity but did not match food-associated calls to either 'surprise' or 'food' targets. We propose environmental cues are required to interpret food-associated calls that occur across a variety of contexts. These findings suggest bonobo alarm calls evoke object- and affect-based representations for Kanzi, indicating the mechanisms underlying the perception of non-human vocalizations may be more similar to those in language than previously thought.

U2 - 10.1098/rsos.241901

DO - 10.1098/rsos.241901

M3 - Article

C2 - 40046665

SN - 2054-5703

VL - 12

JO - Royal Society Open Science

JF - Royal Society Open Science

IS - 3

M1 - 241901

ER -