TY - JOUR
T1 - Contact, the feature pool and the speech community
T2 - The emergence of Multicultural London English.
AU - Cheshire, Jenny
AU - Kerswill, Paul
AU - Fox, Susan
AU - Torgersen, Eivind
PY - 2011/4
Y1 - 2011/4
N2 - In Northern Europe’s major cities, new varieties of the host languages are emerging in the multilingual inner cities. While some analyse these ‘multiethnolects’ as youth styles, we take a variationist approach to an emerging ‘Multicultural London English’ (MLE), asking: (1) what features characterise MLE? (2) at what age(s) are they acquired? (3) is MLE vernacularised? (4) when did MLE emerge, and what factors enabled its emergence? We argue that innovations in the diphthongs and the quotative system are generated from the specific sociolinguistics of inner-city London, where at least half the population is undergoing group second-language acquisition and where high linguistic diversity leads to a feature pool to select from. We look for incrementation (Labov) in the acquisition of the features, but find this only for two ‘global’ changes, BE LIKE and GOOSE-fronting, for which adolescents show the highest usage. Community-internal factors explain the age-related variation in the remaining features.
AB - In Northern Europe’s major cities, new varieties of the host languages are emerging in the multilingual inner cities. While some analyse these ‘multiethnolects’ as youth styles, we take a variationist approach to an emerging ‘Multicultural London English’ (MLE), asking: (1) what features characterise MLE? (2) at what age(s) are they acquired? (3) is MLE vernacularised? (4) when did MLE emerge, and what factors enabled its emergence? We argue that innovations in the diphthongs and the quotative system are generated from the specific sociolinguistics of inner-city London, where at least half the population is undergoing group second-language acquisition and where high linguistic diversity leads to a feature pool to select from. We look for incrementation (Labov) in the acquisition of the features, but find this only for two ‘global’ changes, BE LIKE and GOOSE-fronting, for which adolescents show the highest usage. Community-internal factors explain the age-related variation in the remaining features.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954994418&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00478.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00478.x
M3 - Article
SN - 1360-6441
VL - 15
SP - 151
EP - 196
JO - Journal of Sociolinguistics
JF - Journal of Sociolinguistics
IS - 2
ER -