Contingency in risk management: the case of pension funds in Sweden and Finland

TY - CHAP

T1 - Contingency in risk management

T2 - the case of pension funds in Sweden and Finland

AU - Sorsa, Ville-Pekka

AU - Roumpakis, Antonios

N1 - © The authors and Foundation for European Progressive Studies. Reproduced with permission from the publisher.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Capital derived from statutory and voluntary pension arrangements has played a role of utmost importance in the development of capitalist national economies and of global finance. And yet, despite this increasing interest in pension funds in the social sciences, the topic has gained very little attention in social policy. We argue that while it remains essential for social policy to focus on benefit delivery, these studies should be complemented and completed with an analysis on pension fund investment-making – the ‘asset side’ of pension provision. Indeed, funded, partially funded or prefunded pension systems are not only about generating returns to improve old-age pension benefits or to decrease pension costs. They are equally much about financial pension power: about generating vast pools of capital that can be used in various different ways to achieve different kinds of policy targets. We argue it is at best arbitrary and at worst inconsistent for social policy studies to focus on liabilities and put assets aside when studying and especially classifying pension systems and histories.

AB - Capital derived from statutory and voluntary pension arrangements has played a role of utmost importance in the development of capitalist national economies and of global finance. And yet, despite this increasing interest in pension funds in the social sciences, the topic has gained very little attention in social policy. We argue that while it remains essential for social policy to focus on benefit delivery, these studies should be complemented and completed with an analysis on pension fund investment-making – the ‘asset side’ of pension provision. Indeed, funded, partially funded or prefunded pension systems are not only about generating returns to improve old-age pension benefits or to decrease pension costs. They are equally much about financial pension power: about generating vast pools of capital that can be used in various different ways to achieve different kinds of policy targets. We argue it is at best arbitrary and at worst inconsistent for social policy studies to focus on liabilities and put assets aside when studying and especially classifying pension systems and histories.

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SP - 169

EP - 198

BT - Rethinking social risks in the Nordics

A2 - Sorsa, Ville-Pekka

PB - Foundation for European Progressive Studies

CY - Brussels

ER -