Critical Exchange: The Nature of Silence and Its Democratic Possibilities

Monica Alexandra Brito-Vieira; Theo Jung; Sean Gray; Toby Rollo

doi:10.1057/s41296- 019-00330-2;

Critical Exchange: The Nature of Silence and Its Democratic Possibilities

Monica Alexandra Brito-Vieira, Theo Jung, Sean Gray, Toby Rollo

Politics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

In 2003, this journal published a groundbreaking article entitled ‘‘Silence: A Politics’’. The author, Kennan Ferguson, wrote against the traditional understand-ing of silence as ‘‘inimical to politics’’. It was time, he claimed, to consider the full-breadth of possibilities of political agency that lay in silence, for the politics of silence was irreducible to domination and the possibilities of resistance it engenders: i.e., to silencing (denial of agency) and silent resistance (reactive agency). Silence could also be positively constitutive of selves, individual and collective.The challenge to revisit the agential potentials of silence was launched, but it would take some years before poli tical theorists took heed of it. This is starting to happen now. However, to address the possibilities of agency in silence, political theorists are feeling the need to return to basics: the nature of silence, and the relationship between silence and speech. These are also the questions driving this critical exchange: In what ways is silence like speech, and in what ways is it different? What can the comparison between silence and speech tell us about the nature of silence, the best ways to identify and study it, and the potentials and dangers it opens for democratic politics?

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	424-447
Journal	CONTEMPORARY POLITICAL THEORY
Volume	18
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296- 019-00330-2;
Publication status	Published - 1 Sept 2019

Bibliographical note

©2019 Springer Nature Limited. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.

Access to Document

10.1057/s41296- 019-00330-2;

CPT_CE_2019_silence_PURE
©2019 Springer Nature Limited. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.
Accepted author manuscript, 165 KB

Cite this

@article{ea5c1c194dc6459ebf0d44131a26e552,

title = "Critical Exchange: The Nature of Silence and Its Democratic Possibilities",

abstract = "In 2003, this journal published a groundbreaking article entitled {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}Silence: A Politics{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright}. The author, Kennan Ferguson, wrote against the traditional understand-ing of silence as {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}inimical to politics{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright}. It was time, he claimed, to consider the full-breadth of possibilities of political agency that lay in silence, for the politics of silence was irreducible to domination and the possibilities of resistance it engenders: i.e., to silencing (denial of agency) and silent resistance (reactive agency). Silence could also be positively constitutive of selves, individual and collective.The challenge to revisit the agential potentials of silence was launched, but it would take some years before poli tical theorists took heed of it. This is starting to happen now. However, to address the possibilities of agency in silence, political theorists are feeling the need to return to basics: the nature of silence, and the relationship between silence and speech. These are also the questions driving this critical exchange: In what ways is silence like speech, and in what ways is it different? What can the comparison between silence and speech tell us about the nature of silence, the best ways to identify and study it, and the potentials and dangers it opens for democratic politics?",

author = "Brito-Vieira, {Monica Alexandra} and Theo Jung and Sean Gray and Toby Rollo",

note = "{\textcopyright}2019 Springer Nature Limited. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher{\textquoteright}s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.",

year = "2019",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1057/s41296- 019-00330-2;",

language = "English",

volume = "18",

pages = "424--447",

journal = "CONTEMPORARY POLITICAL THEORY",

issn = "1470-8914",

publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical Exchange: The Nature of Silence and Its Democratic Possibilities

AU - Brito-Vieira, Monica Alexandra

AU - Jung, Theo

AU - Gray, Sean

AU - Rollo, Toby

N1 - ©2019 Springer Nature Limited. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - In 2003, this journal published a groundbreaking article entitled ‘‘Silence: A Politics’’. The author, Kennan Ferguson, wrote against the traditional understand-ing of silence as ‘‘inimical to politics’’. It was time, he claimed, to consider the full-breadth of possibilities of political agency that lay in silence, for the politics of silence was irreducible to domination and the possibilities of resistance it engenders: i.e., to silencing (denial of agency) and silent resistance (reactive agency). Silence could also be positively constitutive of selves, individual and collective.The challenge to revisit the agential potentials of silence was launched, but it would take some years before poli tical theorists took heed of it. This is starting to happen now. However, to address the possibilities of agency in silence, political theorists are feeling the need to return to basics: the nature of silence, and the relationship between silence and speech. These are also the questions driving this critical exchange: In what ways is silence like speech, and in what ways is it different? What can the comparison between silence and speech tell us about the nature of silence, the best ways to identify and study it, and the potentials and dangers it opens for democratic politics?

AB - In 2003, this journal published a groundbreaking article entitled ‘‘Silence: A Politics’’. The author, Kennan Ferguson, wrote against the traditional understand-ing of silence as ‘‘inimical to politics’’. It was time, he claimed, to consider the full-breadth of possibilities of political agency that lay in silence, for the politics of silence was irreducible to domination and the possibilities of resistance it engenders: i.e., to silencing (denial of agency) and silent resistance (reactive agency). Silence could also be positively constitutive of selves, individual and collective.The challenge to revisit the agential potentials of silence was launched, but it would take some years before poli tical theorists took heed of it. This is starting to happen now. However, to address the possibilities of agency in silence, political theorists are feeling the need to return to basics: the nature of silence, and the relationship between silence and speech. These are also the questions driving this critical exchange: In what ways is silence like speech, and in what ways is it different? What can the comparison between silence and speech tell us about the nature of silence, the best ways to identify and study it, and the potentials and dangers it opens for democratic politics?

U2 - 10.1057/s41296- 019-00330-2;

DO - 10.1057/s41296- 019-00330-2;

M3 - Article

SN - 1470-8914

VL - 18

SP - 424

EP - 447

JO - CONTEMPORARY POLITICAL THEORY

JF - CONTEMPORARY POLITICAL THEORY

IS - 3

ER -