By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Crossing boundaries: Social science in the policy room

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review



Publication details

JournalScience, Technology and Human Values
DatePublished - Jul 2007
Issue number4
Number of pages21
Pages (from-to)458-478
Original languageEnglish


This article discusses the relationship between a deconstructivist method in science and technology studies (STS) and the more recent moves towards a reconstructivist engagement with science and science policy making. Drawing on examples from the author's own research, the article identifies three forms of engagement and their relative utility and limitations. The article argues that these are typical of STS work that seeks direct engagement with science policy making and which could form the basis for a more "serviceable STS" that retains its critical and independent perspective on science. The paper concludes by arguing that the analysis has important implications for the ways in which STS expertise can articulate with science policy making.

    Research areas

  • boundary, STS engagement, expertise, science policy, 3RD WAVE, TECHNOLOGY, EXPERTISE, RISK

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations