Debating conditionality for disability benefits recipients and welfare reform: research evidence from Pathways to Work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The Coalition Government's reform of welfare has revived debate about the imposition of conditions on receipt of disability benefits. In particular a debate published in the journal 'Policy and Politics' in 2011 discussed the extension of increased conditionality to this group and the associated policy levers, often referred to as 'carrots' (incentives) and 'sticks' (sanctions). This article adds to the debate by presenting findings from research with service users of Pathways to Work (until recently the main employment programme for people on disability benefits). These findings help to argue for greater recognition of the heterogeneity and diverse levels of need among disability benefits claimants, demonstrate advantages and disadvantages of conditional benefit receipt, and highlight the limited effectiveness of incentives and sanctions. Furthermore findings suggest a need to reconsider the emphasis in government policy on conditionality, where this obscures messages about the availability of personalised support.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)514-528
Number of pages15
JournalLocal Economy
Volume27
Issue number5-6
Early online date20 Apr 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2012

Keywords

  • benefits
  • disability benefits
  • welfare
  • disability
  • welfare reform
  • unemployment
  • ILL-HEALTH
  • incapacity benefit
  • incapacity benefit claimants

Cite this