By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation to implement the Ecosystem Approach

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Standard

Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation to implement the Ecosystem Approach. / Orchard-Webb, Johanne; Kenter, Jasper O.; Bryce, Ros; Church, Andrew.

In: Ecosystem Services, Vol. 21, No. Part B, 09.11.2016, p. 308-318.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Harvard

Orchard-Webb, J, Kenter, JO, Bryce, R & Church, A 2016, 'Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation to implement the Ecosystem Approach', Ecosystem Services, vol. 21, no. Part B, pp. 308-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.005

APA

Orchard-Webb, J., Kenter, J. O., Bryce, R., & Church, A. (2016). Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation to implement the Ecosystem Approach. Ecosystem Services, 21(Part B), 308-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.005

Vancouver

Orchard-Webb J, Kenter JO, Bryce R, Church A. Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation to implement the Ecosystem Approach. Ecosystem Services. 2016 Nov 9;21(Part B):308-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.005

Author

Orchard-Webb, Johanne ; Kenter, Jasper O. ; Bryce, Ros ; Church, Andrew. / Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation to implement the Ecosystem Approach. In: Ecosystem Services. 2016 ; Vol. 21, No. Part B. pp. 308-318.

Bibtex - Download

@article{e72a23141ab6489897759557e9d6a151,
title = "Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation to implement the Ecosystem Approach",
abstract = "The potential for developing the participatory dimensions of the Ecosystem Approach are examined through the work of Habermas to guide the design of Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation (DDMV) and elicit social willingness to pay. DDMV is contrasted with Deliberated Preferences approaches, which are a deliberative adaptation of stated preference techniques and comprise almost all Deliberative Monetary Valuation studies so far. In a detailed case study where coastal and marine cultural ecosystem services were set within a broader societal context, DDMV was undertaken through three iterative workshops involving a single group of participants representing local residents and different interests across the public, private and third sectors. The use of DDMV generates insights into its potential for securing a socially sustainable route to environmental management: sustainable development that brings together values for ecosystem services with other social priorities, is more inclusive of diverse user needs and values, and is sensitive to issues of environmental justice. As well as highlighting the benefits and challenges that a more democratic deliberative valuation presents, we highlight the practical strengths and vulnerabilities of this approach and indicate directions for further methodological evolution of DDMV.",
keywords = "Communicative rationality, Cultural ecosystem services, Deliberative democracy, Deliberative monetary valuation, Environmental justice, Shared values",
author = "Johanne Orchard-Webb and Kenter, {Jasper O.} and Ros Bryce and Andrew Church",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2016 The Authors. ",
year = "2016",
month = nov,
day = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.005",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "308--318",
journal = "Ecosystem Services",
issn = "2212-0416",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "Part B",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation to implement the Ecosystem Approach

AU - Orchard-Webb, Johanne

AU - Kenter, Jasper O.

AU - Bryce, Ros

AU - Church, Andrew

N1 - © 2016 The Authors.

PY - 2016/11/9

Y1 - 2016/11/9

N2 - The potential for developing the participatory dimensions of the Ecosystem Approach are examined through the work of Habermas to guide the design of Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation (DDMV) and elicit social willingness to pay. DDMV is contrasted with Deliberated Preferences approaches, which are a deliberative adaptation of stated preference techniques and comprise almost all Deliberative Monetary Valuation studies so far. In a detailed case study where coastal and marine cultural ecosystem services were set within a broader societal context, DDMV was undertaken through three iterative workshops involving a single group of participants representing local residents and different interests across the public, private and third sectors. The use of DDMV generates insights into its potential for securing a socially sustainable route to environmental management: sustainable development that brings together values for ecosystem services with other social priorities, is more inclusive of diverse user needs and values, and is sensitive to issues of environmental justice. As well as highlighting the benefits and challenges that a more democratic deliberative valuation presents, we highlight the practical strengths and vulnerabilities of this approach and indicate directions for further methodological evolution of DDMV.

AB - The potential for developing the participatory dimensions of the Ecosystem Approach are examined through the work of Habermas to guide the design of Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation (DDMV) and elicit social willingness to pay. DDMV is contrasted with Deliberated Preferences approaches, which are a deliberative adaptation of stated preference techniques and comprise almost all Deliberative Monetary Valuation studies so far. In a detailed case study where coastal and marine cultural ecosystem services were set within a broader societal context, DDMV was undertaken through three iterative workshops involving a single group of participants representing local residents and different interests across the public, private and third sectors. The use of DDMV generates insights into its potential for securing a socially sustainable route to environmental management: sustainable development that brings together values for ecosystem services with other social priorities, is more inclusive of diverse user needs and values, and is sensitive to issues of environmental justice. As well as highlighting the benefits and challenges that a more democratic deliberative valuation presents, we highlight the practical strengths and vulnerabilities of this approach and indicate directions for further methodological evolution of DDMV.

KW - Communicative rationality

KW - Cultural ecosystem services

KW - Deliberative democracy

KW - Deliberative monetary valuation

KW - Environmental justice

KW - Shared values

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011382660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.005

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85011382660

VL - 21

SP - 308

EP - 318

JO - Ecosystem Services

JF - Ecosystem Services

SN - 2212-0416

IS - Part B

ER -

York staff: edit these data