Diet Predicts Mind and Moral Concern Towards a Broad Range of Animal Categories

Rob Jenkins; Elise Hankins; Ellen Bousfield; Matti Wilks

doi:10.5964/phair.14597

Diet Predicts Mind and Moral Concern Towards a Broad Range of Animal Categories

Rob Jenkins, Elise Hankins^*, Ellen Bousfield, Matti Wilks

^*Corresponding author for this work

Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

A compelling body of research demonstrates that diet (eg vegetarianism) plays an important role in the moral concern people grant to animals. However, this research has focused mostly on ‘food’animals, leaving us with limited understanding of the scope of this effect. We investigated how vegans/vegetarians (veg* ns) and omnivores attribute mind (Study 1) and moral standing (Study 2) across a wide range of animal categories. In Study 1, veg* ns perceived greater mental capacities for most animal categories. Both veg* ns and omnivores gave some categories lesser ratings than others (eg evolutionarily distant vs. close to humans), suggesting that veg* ns and omnivores follow similar patterns of mind perception. In Study 2, however, veg* ns both attributed animals greater moral standing overall and gave similar ratings across categories (eg toward ‘liked’animals such as rabbits and ‘disliked’animals such as rats), whereas omnivores drew sharper distinctions between categories. These studies demonstrate that meat avoidance is a meaningful factor not only in the perceptions of animals that people eat, but also other animals.

Original language	English
Article number	e14597
Number of pages	27
Journal	Psychology of Human-Animal Intergroup Relations
Volume	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5964/phair.14597
Publication status	Published - 17 Dec 2024

Access to Document

10.5964/phair.14597Licence: CC BY

Diet Predicts Mind and Moral Concern Towards a Broad Range of Animal CategoriesFinal published version, 2.33 MBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{a639497b7ded4e10a8d407b9bc69f079,

title = "Diet Predicts Mind and Moral Concern Towards a Broad Range of Animal Categories",

abstract = "A compelling body of research demonstrates that diet (eg vegetarianism) plays an important role in the moral concern people grant to animals. However, this research has focused mostly on {\textquoteleft}food{\textquoteright}animals, leaving us with limited understanding of the scope of this effect. We investigated how vegans/vegetarians (veg* ns) and omnivores attribute mind (Study 1) and moral standing (Study 2) across a wide range of animal categories. In Study 1, veg* ns perceived greater mental capacities for most animal categories. Both veg* ns and omnivores gave some categories lesser ratings than others (eg evolutionarily distant vs. close to humans), suggesting that veg* ns and omnivores follow similar patterns of mind perception. In Study 2, however, veg* ns both attributed animals greater moral standing overall and gave similar ratings across categories (eg toward {\textquoteleft}liked{\textquoteright}animals such as rabbits and {\textquoteleft}disliked{\textquoteright}animals such as rats), whereas omnivores drew sharper distinctions between categories. These studies demonstrate that meat avoidance is a meaningful factor not only in the perceptions of animals that people eat, but also other animals.",

author = "Rob Jenkins and Elise Hankins and Ellen Bousfield and Matti Wilks",

year = "2024",

month = dec,

day = "17",

doi = "10.5964/phair.14597",

language = "English",

volume = "3",

journal = "Psychology of Human-Animal Intergroup Relations",

issn = "2750-6649",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diet Predicts Mind and Moral Concern Towards a Broad Range of Animal Categories

AU - Jenkins, Rob

AU - Hankins, Elise

AU - Bousfield, Ellen

AU - Wilks, Matti

PY - 2024/12/17

Y1 - 2024/12/17

N2 - A compelling body of research demonstrates that diet (eg vegetarianism) plays an important role in the moral concern people grant to animals. However, this research has focused mostly on ‘food’animals, leaving us with limited understanding of the scope of this effect. We investigated how vegans/vegetarians (veg* ns) and omnivores attribute mind (Study 1) and moral standing (Study 2) across a wide range of animal categories. In Study 1, veg* ns perceived greater mental capacities for most animal categories. Both veg* ns and omnivores gave some categories lesser ratings than others (eg evolutionarily distant vs. close to humans), suggesting that veg* ns and omnivores follow similar patterns of mind perception. In Study 2, however, veg* ns both attributed animals greater moral standing overall and gave similar ratings across categories (eg toward ‘liked’animals such as rabbits and ‘disliked’animals such as rats), whereas omnivores drew sharper distinctions between categories. These studies demonstrate that meat avoidance is a meaningful factor not only in the perceptions of animals that people eat, but also other animals.

AB - A compelling body of research demonstrates that diet (eg vegetarianism) plays an important role in the moral concern people grant to animals. However, this research has focused mostly on ‘food’animals, leaving us with limited understanding of the scope of this effect. We investigated how vegans/vegetarians (veg* ns) and omnivores attribute mind (Study 1) and moral standing (Study 2) across a wide range of animal categories. In Study 1, veg* ns perceived greater mental capacities for most animal categories. Both veg* ns and omnivores gave some categories lesser ratings than others (eg evolutionarily distant vs. close to humans), suggesting that veg* ns and omnivores follow similar patterns of mind perception. In Study 2, however, veg* ns both attributed animals greater moral standing overall and gave similar ratings across categories (eg toward ‘liked’animals such as rabbits and ‘disliked’animals such as rats), whereas omnivores drew sharper distinctions between categories. These studies demonstrate that meat avoidance is a meaningful factor not only in the perceptions of animals that people eat, but also other animals.

U2 - 10.5964/phair.14597

DO - 10.5964/phair.14597

M3 - Article

SN - 2750-6649

VL - 3

JO - Psychology of Human-Animal Intergroup Relations

JF - Psychology of Human-Animal Intergroup Relations

M1 - e14597

ER -