TY - JOUR
T1 - Dignity during work-integrated learning
T2 - what does it mean for supervisors and students?
AU - King, Olivia
AU - Davis, Corinne
AU - Clemans, Allie
AU - Coles, Jan
AU - Crampton, Paul
AU - Jacobs, Nicky
AU - McKeown, Tui
AU - Morphet, Julia
AU - Seear, Kate
AU - Rees, Charlotte
PY - 2019/8/14
Y1 - 2019/8/14
N2 - Work-integrated learning (WIL) is increasingly common in higher education, with benefits and risks for students and supervisors’ wellbeing. Central to wellbeing is dignity, often described as the respectful treatment of others. While studies have explored dignity for employees, it is yet to be examined in the WIL context. This qualitative study explores 46 student and 30 supervisors' understandings of WIL dignity. Using purposive sampling, supervisors and students from 6 disciplines participated in 7 groups and 58 individual semi-structured interviews. Participants were asked to describe their understandings of workplace dignity and data were analysed using team-based framework analysis. Four themes were identified: (1) participants' difficulties articulating dignity; (2) concepts used to define dignity; (3) the valence of conceptualisations; and (4) the levels to which dignity were conceptualised. Both students and supervisors need to work together to better understand what dignity is as the crucial first step toward maximising dignity during WIL.
AB - Work-integrated learning (WIL) is increasingly common in higher education, with benefits and risks for students and supervisors’ wellbeing. Central to wellbeing is dignity, often described as the respectful treatment of others. While studies have explored dignity for employees, it is yet to be examined in the WIL context. This qualitative study explores 46 student and 30 supervisors' understandings of WIL dignity. Using purposive sampling, supervisors and students from 6 disciplines participated in 7 groups and 58 individual semi-structured interviews. Participants were asked to describe their understandings of workplace dignity and data were analysed using team-based framework analysis. Four themes were identified: (1) participants' difficulties articulating dignity; (2) concepts used to define dignity; (3) the valence of conceptualisations; and (4) the levels to which dignity were conceptualised. Both students and supervisors need to work together to better understand what dignity is as the crucial first step toward maximising dignity during WIL.
KW - dignity
KW - students
KW - supervisors
KW - Work-integrated learning (WIL)
KW - workplace learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070924844&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03075079.2019.1650736
DO - 10.1080/03075079.2019.1650736
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85070924844
SN - 0307-5079
JO - Studies in Higher Education
JF - Studies in Higher Education
ER -