By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

From the same journal

Discrimination and the "spare room subsidy": an analysis of Carmichael

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Standard

Discrimination and the "spare room subsidy": an analysis of Carmichael. / Meers, Jed Graham.

In: Journal of Housing Law, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2017, p. 24-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Harvard

Meers, JG 2017, 'Discrimination and the "spare room subsidy": an analysis of Carmichael', Journal of Housing Law, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 24-29.

APA

Meers, J. G. (2017). Discrimination and the "spare room subsidy": an analysis of Carmichael. Journal of Housing Law, 20(2), 24-29.

Vancouver

Meers JG. Discrimination and the "spare room subsidy": an analysis of Carmichael. Journal of Housing Law. 2017;20(2):24-29.

Author

Meers, Jed Graham. / Discrimination and the "spare room subsidy": an analysis of Carmichael. In: Journal of Housing Law. 2017 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 24-29.

Bibtex - Download

@article{16e8e822428c45a5be98dc62c237a570,
title = "Discrimination and the {"}spare room subsidy{"}: an analysis of Carmichael",
abstract = "Examines the Supreme Court ruling in R. (on the application of Carmichael) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions on whether the bedroom tax was discriminatory. Reflects on possible problems involving the court's approach to the {"}manifestly without reasonable foundation{"} test, the transparent medical need for an additional bedroom, the relevant international duties, and the hazards of the discretionary payments scheme.",
author = "Meers, {Jed Graham}",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "24--29",
journal = "Journal of Housing Law",
issn = "1368-6542",
number = "2",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discrimination and the "spare room subsidy": an analysis of Carmichael

AU - Meers, Jed Graham

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Examines the Supreme Court ruling in R. (on the application of Carmichael) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions on whether the bedroom tax was discriminatory. Reflects on possible problems involving the court's approach to the "manifestly without reasonable foundation" test, the transparent medical need for an additional bedroom, the relevant international duties, and the hazards of the discretionary payments scheme.

AB - Examines the Supreme Court ruling in R. (on the application of Carmichael) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions on whether the bedroom tax was discriminatory. Reflects on possible problems involving the court's approach to the "manifestly without reasonable foundation" test, the transparent medical need for an additional bedroom, the relevant international duties, and the hazards of the discretionary payments scheme.

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 20

SP - 24

EP - 29

JO - Journal of Housing Law

JF - Journal of Housing Law

SN - 1368-6542

IS - 2

ER -