Disorders of consciousness: ethical implications in diagnosis, prognosis and management

Stephen Michael Holland; Francesca Pistoia

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-40033-0_19

Disorders of consciousness: ethical implications in diagnosis, prognosis and management

Stephen Michael Holland, Francesca Pistoia

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Abstract

The first half of this chapter presents a taxonomy of Disorders of Consciousness (DOCs), which includes coma, the Vegetative State (VS) and the Minimally Conscious State (MCS). Difficulties in clinically assessing patients with disordered consciousness are described, including the reliability of current and potential diagnostic techniques, in order to establish that DOC diagnoses and prognoses are uncertain. The second half of this chapter addresses the ethics of managing DOC patients. The main end-of-life ethics issue is the withdrawal of artificial life support from DOC patients. In many jurisdictions, including England, it is legally permitted to withdraw artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) from persistent VS patients in order to let them die. Should this be extended to MCS patients? It is argued that the decision to allow MCS patients to die should not turn on the fact that DOC diagnoses and prognoses are uncertain. Nonetheless, there are other grounds for extending permission to withdraw ANH to MCS patients; three are discussed, namely, autonomy, best interests, and futile treatment.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Contemporary European Perspectives on the Ethics of End of Life Care
Publisher	Springer
Pages	277-295
Number of pages	19
ISBN (Print)	9783030400323
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40033-0_19
Publication status	Published - 2020

Publication series

Name	Philosophy and Medicine

Keywords

disorders of consciousness, vegetative state, minimally conscious state, end-of-life ethics, withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration, best interest

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-030-40033-0_19

Cite this

@inbook{b7dd89f8b2b140cca3ff5d99705c85e7,

title = "Disorders of consciousness: ethical implications in diagnosis, prognosis and management",

abstract = "The first half of this chapter presents a taxonomy of Disorders of Consciousness (DOCs), which includes coma, the Vegetative State (VS) and the Minimally Conscious State (MCS). Difficulties in clinically assessing patients with disordered consciousness are described, including the reliability of current and potential diagnostic techniques, in order to establish that DOC diagnoses and prognoses are uncertain. The second half of this chapter addresses the ethics of managing DOC patients. The main end-of-life ethics issue is the withdrawal of artificial life support from DOC patients. In many jurisdictions, including England, it is legally permitted to withdraw artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) from persistent VS patients in order to let them die. Should this be extended to MCS patients? It is argued that the decision to allow MCS patients to die should not turn on the fact that DOC diagnoses and prognoses are uncertain. Nonetheless, there are other grounds for extending permission to withdraw ANH to MCS patients; three are discussed, namely, autonomy, best interests, and futile treatment.",

keywords = "disorders of consciousness, vegetative state, minimally conscious state, end-of-life ethics, withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration, best interest",

author = "Holland, {Stephen Michael} and Francesca Pistoia",

year = "2020",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-40033-0_19",

language = "English",

isbn = "9783030400323",

series = "Philosophy and Medicine",

publisher = "Springer",

pages = "277--295",

booktitle = "Contemporary European Perspectives on the Ethics of End of Life Care",

address = "Germany",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Disorders of consciousness

T2 - ethical implications in diagnosis, prognosis and management

AU - Holland, Stephen Michael

AU - Pistoia, Francesca

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - The first half of this chapter presents a taxonomy of Disorders of Consciousness (DOCs), which includes coma, the Vegetative State (VS) and the Minimally Conscious State (MCS). Difficulties in clinically assessing patients with disordered consciousness are described, including the reliability of current and potential diagnostic techniques, in order to establish that DOC diagnoses and prognoses are uncertain. The second half of this chapter addresses the ethics of managing DOC patients. The main end-of-life ethics issue is the withdrawal of artificial life support from DOC patients. In many jurisdictions, including England, it is legally permitted to withdraw artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) from persistent VS patients in order to let them die. Should this be extended to MCS patients? It is argued that the decision to allow MCS patients to die should not turn on the fact that DOC diagnoses and prognoses are uncertain. Nonetheless, there are other grounds for extending permission to withdraw ANH to MCS patients; three are discussed, namely, autonomy, best interests, and futile treatment.

AB - The first half of this chapter presents a taxonomy of Disorders of Consciousness (DOCs), which includes coma, the Vegetative State (VS) and the Minimally Conscious State (MCS). Difficulties in clinically assessing patients with disordered consciousness are described, including the reliability of current and potential diagnostic techniques, in order to establish that DOC diagnoses and prognoses are uncertain. The second half of this chapter addresses the ethics of managing DOC patients. The main end-of-life ethics issue is the withdrawal of artificial life support from DOC patients. In many jurisdictions, including England, it is legally permitted to withdraw artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) from persistent VS patients in order to let them die. Should this be extended to MCS patients? It is argued that the decision to allow MCS patients to die should not turn on the fact that DOC diagnoses and prognoses are uncertain. Nonetheless, there are other grounds for extending permission to withdraw ANH to MCS patients; three are discussed, namely, autonomy, best interests, and futile treatment.

KW - disorders of consciousness, vegetative state, minimally conscious state, end-of-life ethics, withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration, best interest

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-40033-0_19

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-40033-0_19

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783030400323

T3 - Philosophy and Medicine

SP - 277

EP - 295

BT - Contemporary European Perspectives on the Ethics of End of Life Care

PB - Springer

ER -