Distributional cost effectiveness analysis of West Yorkshire low emission zone policies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Alternative strategies can reduce road vehicle emissions, with differential effects on exposure across population groups. We compare alternative strategies in West Yorkshire using a framework for economic evaluation that considers multiple perspectives and that takes account of the distribution of health outcomes.
Exposure to pollutants by area is converted, via dose response relationships, into disease averted. Health benefits and NHS costs from diseases are estimated conditional on population demographics and index of multiple deprivation. The net health benefits from alternative strategies are expressed as distributions of quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE), which are compared using dominance criteria and societal aversion to health inequality. Net production is estimated from intervention costs and the effects of health improvement on production and consumption. Social care outcomes are estimated from health improvement among care recipients and changes in care expenditure.
A switch to less polluting private vehicles is dominant in terms of the distribution of QALE and social care outcomes, but not consumption. Inclusion of health inequality aversion alters the rank order compared to prioritisation on health maximisation. The results were sensitive to the magnitude of health opportunity costs, the level of inequality aversion and the proportion of intervention cost that generates health opportunity cost.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)567-579
Number of pages13
JournalHealth Economics
Volume29
Issue number5
Early online date30 Jan 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 30 Jan 2020

Bibliographical note

© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.

Keywords

  • Economic evaluation
  • Health inequalities
  • Decision analysis
  • Air pollution

Cite this